Switzerland: Many more foreign-domiciled suppliers VAT liable from January 1 2015

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Many more foreign-domiciled suppliers VAT liable from January 1 2015

suter.jpg

rodak.jpg

Benno Suter


Tomas Rodak

The Federal Ministers have concluded that pursuant to the new article 9a of the Swiss VAT Ordinance the general VAT exemption for foreign entities exclusively rendering services and goods that are subject to VAT reverse charge becomes limited to rendering of services only. Since installation, repair, maintenance and leasing, for example, qualify from a Swiss VAT perspective as a supply of goods, many foreign domiciled suppliers doing business in Switzerland have to thoroughly consider their obligation to register for VAT purposes in Switzerland if they generate annual turnover of more than CHF 100,000 with such supplies.

Although this new rule concerns predominantly small, non-Swiss resident craftsmen doing business in Switzerland and in the principality of Liechtenstein, multinational entities might also be affected. Since Switzerland applies a kind of VAT force of attraction, all rendered services of a foreign domiciled entity have to be taxed instead of applying the reverse charge obligation of the buyer once the supplying entity is Swiss VAT registered. No change is foreseen for foreign entities providing telecom or electronic services to Swiss or Liechtenstein resident customers (B2C). All foreign entities rendering such B2C services of more than CHF 100,000 a year must still be VAT registered in Switzerland. Furthermore, a revision of the Swiss VAT Law is on its way and is projected for January 1 2016. This revision defines the VAT registration threshold of CHF 100,000 no longer as Swiss but rather as global turnover that will oblige even more multinational entities to register for VAT purposes in Switzerland. The de-minimis rules for the importation of small goods are also under the scrutiny of the planned revision. If those de-minimis exemptions fall, even more foreign entities will have to register in Switzerland for VAT purposes from January 1 2016. Foreign domiciled entities with no domestic presence need to appoint a Swiss domiciled fiscal representative and have to consider their obligations as VAT payers.

Benno Suter (bsuter@deloitte.ch) and Tomas Rodak (trodak@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 63 66 and +41 58 279 63 64

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Whether it be due to a fragmented advisory market or a rise in M&A, Italy’s frenetic hiring has not gone unnoticed by ITR’s Talent Tracker
The deal gives Azets 14 new partners and boosts its Swedish revenues to over $100 million; in other news, Svalner Atlas launched in Copenhagen
The tax technology company will be providing a free demonstration of its OTP software and offering best practice advice on whether to ‘buy or build’ on September 8
Johanes Glorinus Saragih of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxes outlines the nation’s delicate geopolitical situation, as it sits between a rock and a hard place with the US and pillar two
The law firm’s head of tax, trade and wealth management likens tax legislation to a complex puzzle, recommends a sturdy coffee mug, and explains why acronyms make tax cool
The global tax and accounting firm has appointed two experienced TP advisers from a New Jersey-based boutique
A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Gift this article