Germany: Tax amendments 2015 finalised

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax amendments 2015 finalised

endres.jpg

Dieter Endres

After a series of political disputes, the Bundesrat gave its approval to a watered down Bill to change various tax rules on the lines of a traditional tax amendment act. While the amendments are not drastic, the Bill covers the following.

Income Tax Act

An attempt to transpose the ECJ Beker and Beker judgment of December 18, 2013 (case C-168/11) into national law. The ECJ held the present method of calculating the maximum foreign tax credit to be unacceptable because it effectively reduces personal allowances in proportion to the tax-free foreign source income. The amendment does not completely achieve its object because of a drafting error. Further legislative action is to be expected.

The employee outing tax-free allowance of €110 per head has been retained, but now includes the venue costs as well as the costs of consumption. The main effect is to complicate the administrative burden on employers.

Foreign Tax Act

The profit correction provision has been amended to remove all foreign/domestic considerations from third-party comparisons. This follows from attempts to deny the validity of an unfavourable third-party comparison because one of the parties to it was a local resident.

VAT

Managing portfolio investments on behalf of customers is henceforth a taxable transaction in Germany when performed for a customer in a non-member state of the EU. This responds to an unsuccessful attempt to claim the contrary before the ECJ.

Other changes

In the same session the Bundesrat gave its approval to provisions for less generous treatment of tax evaders coming forward. The restriction follows from improved methods of detection.

Open issues

Proposals that have not been passed, but which remain on the agenda – for 2015 or later – include:

  • a prohibition of a business expense deduction for an outlay that has been or will be deducted abroad. This is primarily intended to counter hybrid financing schemes;

  • taxation of the capital gains of companies from the sale of portfolio shareholdings. This demand of the Bundesrat reflects that body's view of a capital gain as a direct substitute for a dividend;

  • an extension of the intra-group exemption from the loss forfeiture rules for share transfers between related parties; and

  • the abolition of tax-free share exchanges to the extent of a cash balancing payment.

Dieter Endres (dieter.endres@de.pwc.com)

PwC Frankfurt

Tel +49 69 9585 6232

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article