Germany: Discussion draft issued on reform of investment taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Discussion draft issued on reform of investment taxation

wenzel.jpg

vana.jpg

Alexander Wenzel


Thomas Vana

A discussion draft for a reform of Germany's Investment Tax Act published by the Ministry of Finance on July 22 2015 contains fundamental and wide-reaching changes to the taxation of income received by German investors through investment funds. The changes would follow the recent changes effective from December 24 2014. After the release of the discussion draft, a formal legislation procedure might be initiated later in 2015, up until September. If adopted, the new rules would apply as from 1 January 2018.

Under the current tax system, German investors in an investment fund are taxed under the 'tax transparency' principle, that is, profits and income earned by the fund are taxable only in the hands of the investors; the fund is not subject to tax.

The transparent tax system generally would continue to apply to investment funds that do not have more than 100 (non-individual) investors. However, significant changes would be made to the tax treatment of other investment funds and their German investors:

  • The scope of application of the Investment Tax Act would be broadened to capture a number of investment vehicles (except, for example, for typical private equity funds);

  • Taxation would apply at the fund level regardless of where the fund is tax resident.

Investment funds would be subject to the 15% corporate income tax (including the 5.5% solidarity surcharge) on income that is subject to non-resident taxation in Germany, that is, German dividends (including compensation payments), income from real estate assets located in Germany and other income. A tax exemption would be possible only to the extent eligible persons invest in the fund.

At the level of the German investor, the discussion draft provides for taxation of any (1) distributions; (2) lump sum amounts if distributions and appreciation in fund value do not exceed a threshold based on a deemed interest-free rate of return; and (3) capital gains from the disposal of fund units.

To (partially) compensate for the taxation at the fund level, there would be tax relief at the investor level for equity and real estate funds, although stringent requirements would have to be met.

Alexander Wenzel (alwenzel@deloitte.de) andThomas Vana (tvana@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 69 75695 6111 and +49 89 29036 8891

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article