Germany: Discussion draft issued on reform of investment taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Discussion draft issued on reform of investment taxation

wenzel.jpg

vana.jpg

Alexander Wenzel


Thomas Vana

A discussion draft for a reform of Germany's Investment Tax Act published by the Ministry of Finance on July 22 2015 contains fundamental and wide-reaching changes to the taxation of income received by German investors through investment funds. The changes would follow the recent changes effective from December 24 2014. After the release of the discussion draft, a formal legislation procedure might be initiated later in 2015, up until September. If adopted, the new rules would apply as from 1 January 2018.

Under the current tax system, German investors in an investment fund are taxed under the 'tax transparency' principle, that is, profits and income earned by the fund are taxable only in the hands of the investors; the fund is not subject to tax.

The transparent tax system generally would continue to apply to investment funds that do not have more than 100 (non-individual) investors. However, significant changes would be made to the tax treatment of other investment funds and their German investors:

  • The scope of application of the Investment Tax Act would be broadened to capture a number of investment vehicles (except, for example, for typical private equity funds);

  • Taxation would apply at the fund level regardless of where the fund is tax resident.

Investment funds would be subject to the 15% corporate income tax (including the 5.5% solidarity surcharge) on income that is subject to non-resident taxation in Germany, that is, German dividends (including compensation payments), income from real estate assets located in Germany and other income. A tax exemption would be possible only to the extent eligible persons invest in the fund.

At the level of the German investor, the discussion draft provides for taxation of any (1) distributions; (2) lump sum amounts if distributions and appreciation in fund value do not exceed a threshold based on a deemed interest-free rate of return; and (3) capital gains from the disposal of fund units.

To (partially) compensate for the taxation at the fund level, there would be tax relief at the investor level for equity and real estate funds, although stringent requirements would have to be met.

Alexander Wenzel (alwenzel@deloitte.de) andThomas Vana (tvana@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 69 75695 6111 and +49 89 29036 8891

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
Gift this article