Poland: Changes to the Polish corporate income tax law

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Changes to the Polish corporate income tax law

mazurkiewicz.jpg

Pawel Mazurkiewicz

With effect from January 1 2015, the Polish corporate income tax law has been amended substantially. These amendments were mainly aimed at governing three issues:

  • Elimination of certain opportunities for aggressive tax planning (in particular, structures allowing for the tax free exchange of assets);

  • Introduction of the new system of thin capitalisation restrictions; and

  • Introduction of a regime for the taxation of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs).

From the foreign investors' standpoint, the new thin capitalisation regime is certainly the most important item. Until the end of 2014, Polish thin capitalisation restrictions were, in practical terms, irrelevant (the permissible limit of debt-to-equity was 3:1, and even more importantly, in principle only loans provided by direct shareholders were qualified as falling within the scope of thin capitalisation). Therefore, almost all interest paid in respect to loans provided by related parties were fully tax deductible. New shape of this legislation introduces the following features of thin capitalisation:

  • Two alternative systems of restrictions are available (the choice is at the taxpayer's discretion);

  • The basic system is similar to this existing in the past, however much more restrictive (1:1 debt-to-equity limit instead 3:1, all loans from related parties fall within the scope of new regulations, irrespective of whether the relations between a lender or a borrower are direct or indirect);

  • The other system provides that all interest payable on loans (from both related and unrelated parties) may be subject to exclusion from tax deductible costs. However, unlike under the basic system, the factor which is used to decide to what extent interest can be tax deductible is not the debt-to-equity ratio, but the value coming from multiplication of (i) value of assets of a given taxpayer (measured according to the tax regulations) by (ii) basic reference rate of the National Bank of Poland, increased by 1.25%. In practice, this implies that a taxpayer may use large loans from either related or unrelated parties and enjoy the deductibility of interest on them, as long as the interest rate is reasonably low. This system was specifically tailored to the needs of the financial sector (banks, factoring and leasing companies); other entities may theoretically also use it but subject to another limitation, whereby the tax deductible interest cannot be higher than 50% of operating profit.

Very complex CFC regulations (which in the past were not present in the Polish tax system) implement the obligation for Polish taxpayers to report on the activities of the foreign tax residents which are controlled by them, and pay the tax in Poland as if these activities are carried out according to the Polish tax law. The law affects the activities of these foreign taxpayers in different ways, depending on whether they are incorporated in the EU, or countries with which Poland (or the EU) has concluded a treaty on the exchange of fiscal information, or countries involved in unfair tax competition (the list of such countries is published by the Ministry of Finance). Moreover, the factors which may also be important for the scope of the Polish tax obligations relating to CFC activities are the presence of their commercial substance and the height of the income tax rates applicable in the country of their tax residence.

Pawel Mazurkiewicz (pawel.mazurkiewicz@mddp.pl)

MDDP

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article