Brazil: Update on the obligation to disclose certain transactions in Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Update on the obligation to disclose certain transactions in Brazil

Oliveira-Julio
Gottberg-Ruben

Julio Oliveira

Ruben Gottberg

On November 17 2015, the Brazilian Congress approved the project for conversion into law of the Provisional Measure 685/2015 (PM 685/2015), without the articles intended to impose an obligation to disclose tax planning transactions.

PM 685/2015 was released by the Brazilian government on July 21 2015 and introduced, among other provisions, rules concerning the disclosure of certain transactions to the Brazilian Internal Federal Revenue Service (RFB).

In Brazil, a PM is a temporary executive order issued by the executive branch of the government. A PM has the authority of law, but it requires formal conversion into law by the Congress within a 60-day term. If Congress does not act within this initial term, then the measure expires unless extended for an additional 60-day term (such extension can only occur once). On September 9 2015, the Brazilian Congress extended the PM 685/2015 for an additional 60-day term (no further extensions are now permitted).

During the legislative process for converting PM 685/2015 into law, the legislators considered imposing an obligation to disclose tax planning operations resulting in suppression or reduction of taxes.

After extensive discussions involving the legality of tax planning in Brazil and the extension of RFB's powers, which is evidenced by repetitive moving back and forth between the upper and the lower chambers of the Congress, the law project was approved on November 17 2015. Interestingly, the final draft was approved without the articles intended to impose an obligation to disclose tax planning transactions.

The newly converted law will now be submitted for Presidential assent, which may only veto or approve it, without the possibility to reintroduce the provisions excluded by the Congress.

Julio Oliveira (julio.oliveira@br.pwc.com) and Ruben Gottberg (ruben.gottberg@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674 2276

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

SF: Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article