Turkey: A new period for tax audits

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: A new period for tax audits

intl-updates-small.jpg

Future audits undertaken by the Turkish tax authorities will become more transparent and be handled differently.

gozluklu.jpg
bicer.jpg

Burçin Gözlüklü

Ramazan Biçer

The Turkish Minister of Finance, Nağci Ağbal, announced that tax audits will be handled in a new way at a recent press conference. Although he did not clarify what this new way would be, Ağbal said that the Turkish tax authorities will be more transparent during future audits.

In this regard, Turkish tax authorities amended the tax audit guidelines in late September, which introduced new rights for taxpayers to defend themselves during and after the tax audits.

Increased cooperation during audits

In our experience, tax auditors may sometimes request certain documents or data not relevant to a specific tax audit, which increases the burden on the taxpayer. However, the new guidelines will mean that tax auditors will not be able to ask such information if it is not relevant to the subject of the ongoing tax audit.

The changes also intend to increase the cooperation between the tax auditor and taxpayer by allowing the taxpayer to see the tax audit report before it is finalised so that they can develop their arguments against to auditor's claims. In the past, taxpayers only heard the auditor's findings for the first time during the discussion with the report evaluation committee, which is responsible for scrutinising the auditor's report.

In addition, the taxpayer can discuss the auditor's findings and the auditor has to inform the taxpayer about the potential results of the audit report in advance of finalising the audit report.

Taxpayers' new rights

Under the changes, taxpayers will also have the following rights during tax audits:

  • Taxpayers can electronically deliver the documents and data requested by tax auditor;

  • Taxpayers can present explanations and objections that make up a detailed part of the tax audit report;

  • In order to understand the tax auditor's findings and provide their arguments, draft minutes on tax audit findings must be shared with the taxpayers two days before the final audit, including the ultimate conclusions, are mutually signed by the taxpayer and the tax auditor;

  • Taxpayers can choose to defend themselves before the report evaluation committee; and

  • The summarised tax audit report must be forwarded to the taxpayer to inform them of the findings before being heard by the report evaluation committee.

Report evaluation committee

In Turkey, a tax audit is not finalised by a tax audit report.

Where the tax reassessment amount is up to TRY 10 million ($3 million), the audit reports are evaluated by a local report evaluation committee. In cases where the amount is higher than TRY 10 million, the central report evaluation committee must assess the findings within the report.

Where the tax auditor's findings and assessment are not in line with Turkish tax legislation, the report evaluation committee may invalidate and revoke the report. Although this is legally possible, in practice, evaluation committees rarely revoke a tax auditor's report.

In terms of the new guidance, the change is that the taxpayer will know the auditor's findings and claims before being heard by the committee. This change will be quite beneficial for taxpayers to develop strong arguments.

Burçin Gözlüklü (burcin.gozluklu@centrumauditing.com) and Ramazan Biçer (ramazan.bicer@centrumauditing.com)

Centrum Consulting

Tel: +90 216 504 20 66 and +90 216 504 20 66

Website: www.centrumauditing.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article