Serbia introduces widely-disputed VAT rulebook

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia introduces widely-disputed VAT rulebook

intl-updates-small.jpg

A VAT rulebook introducing a new form – called POPDV – could drastically and unnecessarily increase the level of complexity of records for businesses.

rafailovic.jpg

Aleksandra Rafailovic

Published in the Serbian Official Gazette No. 80/16, dated September 30 2016, the rulebook has been met with strong criticism, particularly due to its adoption without consultation and the cooperation of the private sector, as well as without taking into account the actual applicability of the amendments.

One of the most controversial provisions include a requirement for reporting specific information on the characteristics of goods or services, such as the name, type, model, quantity, etc. This reporting requirement would have a serious impact for all businesses, but particularly those in large retail chains.

Research has shown that the average number of fields in a tax return in the EU is 39, but with this latest amendment in Serbia, the number of fields in a VAT return would amount to a total of 297 (17 fields in the application form and 280 in the detailed records).

Although officials have stated that the new form is being introduced to better understand the business activities of VAT payers and improve the efficiency of tax collection, it remains to be seen how the additional reporting requirements (including reporting related to tax-exempt items) will contribute towards that goal. EU practices have shown that increasing the number of reporting fields in VAT returns does not contribute to an increase in VAT collection.

The initially prescribed deadline to implement the regulations was merely three months, thus the race towards finding an appropriate software solution has already commenced. Tax professionals have also highlighted the expected increase in human resource expenditures due to the increasing reporting workload, which is in turn expected to result in higher outsourced accounting/tax advising fees.

However, as a result of the joint initiatives of various parties, the Ministry of Finance declared on October 28 2016 that it will defer the implementation of the POPDV form until 2018 and will – in the meantime – work on amending the Serbian Law on VAT in order to eliminate perceived deficiencies.

Aleksandra Rafailovic (aleksandra.rafailovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast, Serbia Office

Tel: +381 11 3241 484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The US law firm’s tax counsel tells ITR about inspirations from a ‘legendary’ German tax scholar, perfecting riesling wine and what makes tax cool
Wopke Hoekstra also swore the EU would ‘hit back harder’ if faced with a trade war; in other news, a UK watchdog has launched an investigation into an audit completed by MHA
Other reasons included the complexity of reporting, resource constraints and interactions with tax administrations
Despite this boost for investors, the OECD also said that extensive reliance on income-based instruments across economies is concerning
A recent UK First-tier Tribunal decision highlights the broad application of an anti-avoidance rule to deny tax relief, say Robert Waterson and Matthew Cummings of Eversheds Sutherland
Gift this article