Poland: GAAR comes into force in Poland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: GAAR comes into force in Poland

bauta-szostak.jpg

Justyna Bauta-Szostak

The Act introducing a General Anti-Avoidance Rule ("GAAR") in Poland enters into force on July 15 2016.

The most important feature of GAAR is the right given to the Ministry of Finance to deny, in tax computations, an artificial arrangement (or series of arrangements) with tax savings as its principal purpose if the tax savings are not compliant, under the circumstances of the case, with the provisions and purpose of tax laws.

Arrangements investigated under GAAR will be compared to arrangements that could be made by a reasonable taxpayer following fair market goals. These comparative arrangements will form the basis to assess the tax consequences for a taxpayer.

GAAR will be applicable to tax savings achieved after its effective date, regardless of the actual moment of the transaction.

It means that GAAR may be used retroactively with regard to undertakings or arrangements that were made before its introduction, but the effects of which extend to the present day (e.g. a tax loss generated through past events that is settled in present tax returns, or depreciation write-offs regarding assets acquired in the past).

Taking the above into consideration, all arrangements that result in ongoing tax savings, including those made before the introduction of GAAR, must be thoroughly reviewed in the context of GAAR.

It is important to note that tax-saving arrangements, if deemed artificial by the Ministry of Finance, may no longer be protected by ordinary tax rulings.

A taxpayer concerned with GAAR may request for a special safeguarding tax ruling from the Ministry of Finance. The ruling will be issued within six months. The fee for one ruling is approximately €5,000 ($5,500). The ruling is binding for the tax authorities. However, the ruling may be changed by the Ministry of Finance if it conflicts with the verdicts of the Constitutional Tribunal or the European Court of Justice.

The following arrangements may be considered as artificial (which does not exclude other arrangements from possible investigation under GAAR):

  • Operations unreasonably divided;

  • Intermediaries unreasonably involved;

  • Transactions resulting in a situation similar to the one prior to the arrangement (looping);

  • Transactions consisting of mutually nullifying or compensating elements; or

  • Arrangements connected with a business risk exceeding the expected benefits (other than tax savings) to the extent that one must consider a reasonably acting person not to have chosen this course of action.

GAAR will be applicable to tax savings exceeding approximately €25,000.

GAAR shall not be applicable to VAT, but by virtue of a special, separate provision, the GAAR will be extended to VAT issues under the rule of law abuse, enabling tax authorities to deny VAT effects of artificial arrangements.

Justyna Bauta-Szostak (justyna.bauta-szostak@mddp.pl)

Michalik Dłuska Dziedzic & Partners

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The judgment, which saw Denmark's Supreme Court rely on OECD TP guidance, sets aside more than 15 years of consistent administrative practice, experts have told ITR
Belgium’s new coalition government has gone ahead with a new exit tax regime that could land it in the courts.
Brazil’s government has not officially framed the bill as a countermeasure amid trade tensions with the US, but the move is being considered as part of Brazil’s strategic response, one expert tells ITR
Understanding India’s income tax landscape can help charities ensure compliance, optimise tax benefits, and enhance their impact, writes Raghav Bajaj of Khaitan & Co
Tax advisers in Brazil are rising above the country’s notoriously complex tax system to deliver high-quality advisory services, ITR’s exclusive in-house data reveals
ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Gift this article