Germany: Draft tax law includes BEPS measures including CbCR requirements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Draft tax law includes BEPS measures including CbCR requirements

Linn-Alexander
Braun-Thorsten-100

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's Ministry of Finance has issued a draft tax law including measures based on the recommendations in the final reports issued under the OECD base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) initiative and the amendments to the EU administrative cooperation directive to introduce country-by-country reporting (CbCR).

The draft law, issued on June 1 2016, also includes certain non-BEPS-related measures in response to judicial developments in cases where Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) decision went against the views of the tax authorities.

Proposed changes include:

  • CbCR: The proposed country-by-country rules would require multinational companies with consolidated group turnover of €750 million ($830 million) or more to file a country-by-country report including a 'master file' and 'local file' reporting requirement for transfer pricing documentation purposes under certain conditions.

  • Treaty override provision for the application of the arm's-length principle: In 2014, the BFH held that Germany's tax treaties can limit Germany's taxing rights based on section 1(1) of the Foreign Tax Act (FTA) if the treaty contains a provision equivalent to the associated enterprises article in the OECD model treaty and if the prices paid are at arm's-length. The draft law proposes to amend the FTA to eliminate this limitation.

  • Trade tax on income subject to controlled foreign company (CFC) rules: In 2015, the BFH held that passive income of a wholly-owned, low-taxed foreign subsidiary that is subject to the German CFC rules is not subject to German trade tax. The draft law would reverse the BFH's decision.

Another change would only allow exclusion of foreign passive income of foreign permanent establishments for trade tax purposes if the foreign permanent establishment (or partnership) is situated in the EU and has sufficient substance. This change is expected to restrict the use of certain IP structures where license income may not be subject to taxation for trade tax purposes.

The draft law includes the reestablishment of the trade tax on certain dividends distributed by a nonresident subsidiary to a German parent company that is a controlled entity in a German fiscal unity. The draft law would further clarify the application of the participation exemption for banks and financial institutions. Furthermore, the draft law includes amendments to the domestic switch-over and subject-to-tax clauses to prevent the non-taxation or the low taxation of certain items of income of a taxpayer that is subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article