Brazil: Amendments to interest on net equity not passed

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Amendments to interest on net equity not passed

Pereira
Conomy

Alvaro Pereira

Mark Conomy

On March 10 2016, the Brazilian Congress published Act No 5 of 2016, which provided that Provisional Measure 694 (PM 694/2015) expired on March 8 2016 and would not be converted into law. PM 694/2015 was released on September 30 2015, and was principally concerned with amendments to the calculation basis and withholding tax rates applicable to interest on net equity payments (INE).

By way of background, INE is an alternative way of remunerating a shareholder for the investment made in Brazilian companies, calculated based on their net equity. The proposed changes intended to increase the general withholding tax rate on payments to non-tax haven jurisdictions from 15% to 18%. Further, it sought to set a further limit on the calculation base on the INE payment.

Taxpayers should continue to monitor the developments of this issue as it is possible that the proposed amendments will be introduced into a future Provisional Measure or legislative project.

Changes to Brazil’s capital gains tax rates converted into law

On March 16 2016, the President sanctioned the conversion into law of Provisional Measure 692 (PM 692/2015) by Law No 13,259/2016. The key issue contemplated by PM 692/2015 was the change to capital gains rates for individuals and non-residents.

Pursuant to Law No 13,259/2016, capital gains earned by individuals arising on the alienation of Brazilian assets and rights of any nature are subject to income tax at the rates below. Currently, the Brazilian tax legislation provides that non-residents should be subject to the same rules as Brazilian individuals:

  • 15% on the portion of the gain not passing R$ 5 million;

  • 17.5% on the portion of the gain exceeding R$ 5 million and not passing R$ 10 million;

  • 20% on the portion of the gain exceeding R$ 10 million and not passing R$ 30 million; and

  • 22.5% on the portion of the gain that passes R$ 30 million.

Further, capital gains derived by a company, arising on the alienation of non-current assets or rights, should also be subject to the above rates – except for companies which apply the actual, presumed or arbitrary profit methods (being the key methods of calculating tax for Brazilian entities).

The text of the law provides that the law should enter into effect from the date of publication, producing effects from January 1 2016. While a number of paragraphs specifically dealing with how the law would treat capital gains in relation to transactions occurring before December 31 2015 were removed from the final text converted into law, there remains a question around the validity of the law during 2016, where the amendments result in an increase in tax due.

Taxpayers undertaking or intending to undertake reorganisations, sales or acquisitions of Brazilian investments should consider how the changes to the rates may impact their transactions. Further, taxpayers should monitor challenges in relation to the constitutionality of the law in respect of transactions resulting in an increase to the tax due for the 2016 tax year.

Alvaro Pereira (alvaro.pereira@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@pwc.com)

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The US law firm’s tax counsel tells ITR about inspirations from a ‘legendary’ German tax scholar, perfecting riesling wine and what makes tax cool
Wopke Hoekstra also swore the EU would ‘hit back harder’ if faced with a trade war; in other news, a UK watchdog has launched an investigation into an audit completed by MHA
Other reasons included the complexity of reporting, resource constraints and interactions with tax administrations
Despite this boost for investors, the OECD also said that extensive reliance on income-based instruments across economies is concerning
Gift this article