Brazil: Amendments to interest on net equity not passed

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Amendments to interest on net equity not passed

Pereira
Conomy

Alvaro Pereira

Mark Conomy

On March 10 2016, the Brazilian Congress published Act No 5 of 2016, which provided that Provisional Measure 694 (PM 694/2015) expired on March 8 2016 and would not be converted into law. PM 694/2015 was released on September 30 2015, and was principally concerned with amendments to the calculation basis and withholding tax rates applicable to interest on net equity payments (INE).

By way of background, INE is an alternative way of remunerating a shareholder for the investment made in Brazilian companies, calculated based on their net equity. The proposed changes intended to increase the general withholding tax rate on payments to non-tax haven jurisdictions from 15% to 18%. Further, it sought to set a further limit on the calculation base on the INE payment.

Taxpayers should continue to monitor the developments of this issue as it is possible that the proposed amendments will be introduced into a future Provisional Measure or legislative project.

Changes to Brazil’s capital gains tax rates converted into law

On March 16 2016, the President sanctioned the conversion into law of Provisional Measure 692 (PM 692/2015) by Law No 13,259/2016. The key issue contemplated by PM 692/2015 was the change to capital gains rates for individuals and non-residents.

Pursuant to Law No 13,259/2016, capital gains earned by individuals arising on the alienation of Brazilian assets and rights of any nature are subject to income tax at the rates below. Currently, the Brazilian tax legislation provides that non-residents should be subject to the same rules as Brazilian individuals:

  • 15% on the portion of the gain not passing R$ 5 million;

  • 17.5% on the portion of the gain exceeding R$ 5 million and not passing R$ 10 million;

  • 20% on the portion of the gain exceeding R$ 10 million and not passing R$ 30 million; and

  • 22.5% on the portion of the gain that passes R$ 30 million.

Further, capital gains derived by a company, arising on the alienation of non-current assets or rights, should also be subject to the above rates – except for companies which apply the actual, presumed or arbitrary profit methods (being the key methods of calculating tax for Brazilian entities).

The text of the law provides that the law should enter into effect from the date of publication, producing effects from January 1 2016. While a number of paragraphs specifically dealing with how the law would treat capital gains in relation to transactions occurring before December 31 2015 were removed from the final text converted into law, there remains a question around the validity of the law during 2016, where the amendments result in an increase in tax due.

Taxpayers undertaking or intending to undertake reorganisations, sales or acquisitions of Brazilian investments should consider how the changes to the rates may impact their transactions. Further, taxpayers should monitor challenges in relation to the constitutionality of the law in respect of transactions resulting in an increase to the tax due for the 2016 tax year.

Alvaro Pereira (alvaro.pereira@br.pwc.com) and Mark Conomy (conomy.mark@pwc.com)

PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article