New Zealand: New Zealand continues tax administration reform

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand continues tax administration reform

Stewart-Tim

Tim Stewart

The New Zealand Government has continued its consultation on the simplification and modernisation of New Zealand's tax administration system by releasing the discussion document 'Making Tax Simpler – Towards a New Tax Administration Act' (discussion document (DD)).

This DD is the third such DD in a series that addresses New Zealand's tax administration system. (See 'New Zealand: Government seeks public consultation on simplifying and modernising tax administration system' in the May 2015 issue of International Tax Review for our summary of the first two DDs).

The current law governing New Zealand's tax administration system was enacted in 1994 and has not been comprehensively reviewed since then. In the meantime, there have been significant changes in the social, technical and economic environments including the move to online communication, and a perceived increase in demand for improved public services. The Government's aim is to make New Zealand's tax administration system simpler and more flexible for the future.

Three key areas of tax administration addressed in the DD are:

  • the role of the Commissioner of Inland Revenue. The proposals include that the Commissioner's 'care and management' responsibility be clarified to provide the Commissioner with greater administrative flexibility in limited circumstances;

  • the collection of information by Inland Revenue. The proposals include that Inland Revenue's powers to access bulk third-party information be clarified and that Inland Revenue be able to access remotely stored information in the same way that information stored digitally or physically on a taxpayer's premises can be accessed; and

  • the secrecy of tax information. The proposals include that:

    • the current secrecy rule be narrowed from referring to "all information" to information that identifies, or could identify, a taxpayer;

    • consideration be given to whether a taxpayer should be able to consent to the release of their information in certain circumstances; and

    • consideration be given to how Inland Revenue could support improved information flows between government agencies.

In the case of the proposals addressing the secrecy of tax information, while the relaxation of the current secrecy rule may result in efficiencies for the Government and taxpayers, there are concerns about the possible privacy implications. Inland Revenue has the most intrusive information-gathering powers of any government agency. Those powers have traditionally been balanced by Inland Revenue's obligation to use taxpayer information only for the purposes of its tax administration responsibilities. Sharing, even with other government agencies (whose own information-gathering powers are generally less comprehensive), has been permitted only in exceptional and well-defined circumstances. Any relaxation of the restrictions on the use of taxpayer information will need to be carefully considered, especially in the case of information that Inland Revenue has obtained by compulsion of law.

It is expected that legislation to implement some of the measures foreshadowed in the DD may be proposed in Parliament within the next year. Other issues may go through a further consultation stage before legislation is proposed. The Government appears to be proceeding cautiously with these reforms, which is to be commended given the practical and (in some cases) constitutional significance of the issues the proposals raise.

Tim Stewart (tim.stewart@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 4 819 7527

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Looking at transfer pricing simplification is “obviously helpful”, but it should be done in line with current standards, a senior government figure reportedly said
The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The US law firm’s tax counsel tells ITR about inspirations from a ‘legendary’ German tax scholar, perfecting riesling wine and what makes tax cool
Wopke Hoekstra also swore the EU would ‘hit back harder’ if faced with a trade war; in other news, a UK watchdog has launched an investigation into an audit completed by MHA
Other reasons included the complexity of reporting, resource constraints and interactions with tax administrations
Despite this boost for investors, the OECD also said that extensive reliance on income-based instruments across economies is concerning
Gift this article