New Zealand: New Government’s tax priorities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Government’s tax priorities

intl-updates-small.jpg

New Zealand's new government was sworn in on October 26 2017. The new government is a coalition between the Labour Party and New Zealand First Party, with support by way of a confidence and supply agreement with the Green Party.

The arrangement is novel, in that this is the first time since the introduction of the proportional representation system more than 20 years ago that the party with the most seats in Parliament has not been part of the government. Labour, New Zealand First and the Greens hold 46, nine and eight seats, respectively (being 63 seats in total in the 120 seat House of Representatives), while the National Party, which had been in government since 2008, holds 56 seats. The remaining one seat is held by the Act Party, which has traditionally supported National.

The ministers of finance and revenue were appointed from the Labour Party. An associate finance minister has, however, been drawn from each of the New Zealand First and Green parties.

Government's tax policies

The new government has indicated that in its first 100 days it will:

  • Establish a tax working group to consider (among other things) whether there is a fair balance between the taxation of income and assets (this will likely include consideration of a comprehensive capital gains tax); and

  • Repeal the personal income tax cuts legislated under the previous government (which were due to take effect on April 1 2018) and instead implement a more targeted package of assistance.

The government has indicated that it will also:

  • Consider providing additional funding to Inland Revenue to "crack down on multinational tax avoidance";

  • If existing and currently proposed measures are considered insufficient, consider the introduction of a "diverted profits tax" as a further measure to address concerns about multinational tax avoidance;

  • "Crack down" on housing speculation by extending the bright line test (which deems gains on disposal of residential property bought and sold within a certain time period to be taxable, even if the gain would ordinarily be a capital gain) from two years to five years. A person's principal dwelling is excluded from this rule;

  • Introduce measures to prevent property "speculators" from engaging in negative gearing;

  • Abolish secondary tax (the higher rate of tax that is deducted from remuneration for secondary employment) and, as a transitional measure, make the refund process for secondary tax workers automatic;

  • Introduce tax incentives to encourage research and development;

  • Increase the penalties for tax evasion; and

  • Introduce a royalty on exports of bottled water.

The government has also confirmed that legislation will be introduced this year addressing BEPS to ensure multinationals pay their "fair share" of tax. These measures will likely reflect the former government's proposals in this respect.

Tax working group

The government announced the first details of its tax working group on November 23 2017. The tax working group will be chaired by former (Labour Party) Finance Minister Michael Cullen. It will have its first meeting no later than February 2018 and is due to issue its final report by February 2019.

Broadly, the tax working group will consider improvements to structure, fairness and balance in New Zealand's tax system, focusing on future challenges posed by the changing economic environment (accounting for, in particular, changes in technology and employment practices) over the next decade. The tax working group's terms of reference require it to report on:

  • Whether the tax system operates fairly in relation to taxpayers, income and assets, considering in particular:

  • the introduction of a comprehensive capital gains tax (excluding the family home); and

  • a progressive corporate tax (with a lower rate for smaller companies);

  • Whether the tax system appropriately balances the productive and speculative economies;

  • Changes to the tax system that would make it fairer and more balanced and efficient, considering matters such as what role the tax system can play in delivering positive environmental and ecological outcomes over the longer term; and

  • Other changes which, having regard to the interaction of the tax treatment of companies, trusts and individuals, would support the integrity of the tax system.

International tax reform to address BEPS is excluded from the tax working group's terms of reference, reflecting the work on BEPS-related measures that is already underway.

stewart.jpg
riley.jpg

Tim Stewart (tim.stewart@russellmcveagh.com) and Jessica Riley (jessica.riley@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 4 819 7527 and +64 9 367 8183

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Gift this article