Poland: Fundamental change to Polish VAT due January 1 2018

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Fundamental change to Polish VAT due January 1 2018

intl-updates-small.jpg
michalik.jpg
kotaniec.jpg

Tomasz Michalik

Maria Kotaniec

In May 2017 the Minister of Finances published a new project of quite fundamental change of the VAT Act. The project introduces a voluntary mechanism of a split payment scheme in B2B relations. The new regulations are supposed to enter into force on January 1 2018. With the split payment, the government aims to reduce VAT fraud and consequently increase tax revenues.

The naming of the mechanism as "voluntary" may be quite misleading as it is the purchaser who will decide, on their own, whether to use the mechanism or not. The supplier (invoice issuer) will have no influence on the application of the split payment.

The planned split payment mechanism will allow companies to transfer the net amount resulting from an invoice to the supplier's standard bank account and the equivalent amount of the output VAT to the specific VAT account. According to the draft, banks will be obliged to set up a new bank account, called VAT account, for every taxable person in order to allow the purchaser to choose the split payment mechanism or the traditional payment. The money collected on the VAT account of the taxable person will be owned by this taxable person but their right to use them will be limited – in principle the taxable person will be allowed to freely use this to transfer funds to another VAT account or to settle their VAT obligations. In order to use it for other purposes, the taxable person will have to apply for the permission of the head of the Tax Office. The head of the Tax Office will have 90 days to consider the request and make the decision – which is completely discretionary. This is one of the major weaknesses of the proposal.

The purchaser will be entitled to choose the split payment mechanism or to pay the total invoice amount directly to the supplier of the goods or services. In order to encourage customers to use a split payment, the draft provides for some important benefits – any taxable person opting for this type of payment would be exempted from other anti-fraud mechanisms, for instance being jointly and severally liable for the supplier's tax obligations or being punished with additional penalties – sanctions applicable since the beginning of 2017.

The consultations on the proposal are ongoing and there are opinions according to which introducing the split payment mechanism will result in restricting the taxpayer's ownership right and limiting the ability to dispose of the taxpayers' funds. The Minister of Finance believes that due to the "voluntary" character of the split payment introduction of this mechanism does not require any consultation with the European Commission.

Tomasz Michalik (tomasz.michalik@mddp.pl) and Maria Kotaniec (maria.kotaniec@mddp.pl)

MDDP, Poland

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article