Norway: Alterations of the Norwegian tonnage tax regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway: Alterations of the Norwegian tonnage tax regime

intl-updates-small.jpg
ragna.jpg

Ragna Flækøy Skjåkødegård

The Ministry of Finance recently published its letter of notification of the tonnage tax regime to the EFTA Surveillance Agency (ESA), outlining the following alterations in the existing tonnage tax regime:

Bareboat chartering out

The following restrictions/alterations are introduced for bareboat chartering out:

  • Bareboat chartering out is limited to 50% of the total tonnage of the company group's fleet within the tonnage tax regime during an income year. The Ministry of Finance suggest that there should be an option to measure the bareboat chartered out fleet over a period of four years.

  • Bareboat charters must not exceed a contractual period of 5 (+3) years, i.e. five years with the option to extend for three years. Bareboat contracts exceeding 5+3 years will thus constitute disqualifying assets.

  • Strategical management of all vessels chartered out on bareboat terms must be performed from within the EEA.

The Ministry states that intra-group bareboat chartering out will be allowed "unconditionally". There are no limitations introduced for chartering in on bareboat terms.

The limitations are, as a starting point, applicable to new bareboat chartering out contracts. Tonnage chartered out on existing contracts, including options to extend for up to three years, will not be included in the limitation introduced. However, this transitional rule will not apply to what the Ministry calls "long-term contracts", defined as contracts of a duration of more than five years. Long-term contracts will thus be disqualifying for the tonnage tax regime.

Voyage charter/time charter

The Ministry notifies a limitation of 90% on the chartering in of non-EEA flagged vessels on time charter or voyage charter terms. Any limitations will be measured on a yearly basis, but counting the tonnage chartered out for each day of the year. The tonnage will be measured on a company group level. The limitation will only apply to new chartering in contracts.

Inclusion of windmill farm vessels

The Ministry of Finance notifies that vessels involved with construction, maintenance, repair and disassembly of windmills at sea are qualifying for the tonnage tax regime. Up to now, the windmill farm vessels have only constituted qualifying assets to the tonnage tax regime if they have been used in transportation assignments. The extension is notified to take effect from January 1 2017, and the extension was adopted by the Parliament in December 2016, but is awaiting the approval from ESA.

The extension does not comprise windmill farm vessels operating in Norwegian internal waters or Norwegian territorial waters.

Exclusion of vessels not being self-propelled and operating in foreign inland waterways

The Ministry of Finance also notifies that vessels that are not self-propelled and operating mainly in foreign inland waterways should not qualify for the tonnage tax regime. Vessels that are not self-propelled and operating mainly in Norwegian waterways are disqualifying according the current tonnage tax regime.

Except for the extension regarding windmill farm vessels, the alterations are planned to take effect from July 1 2017.

Ragna Flækøy Skjåkødegård (rskjakodegard@deloitte.no), Oslo

Deloitte

Tel: +47 23 27 96 00

Website: www.deloitte.no

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article