Greece: Administrative guidelines published on tax benefits of cross-border restructurings

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Administrative guidelines published on tax benefits of cross-border restructurings

intl-updates-small.jpg
tsourapa.jpg

Diana Tsourapa

The Greek Independent Authority for Public Revenue (IAPR) has published Circular POL. 1057/2017 (the Circular), which sheds some light and provides the much anticipated administrative guidelines on the implementation of the Greek Income Tax Code (GITC) tax beneficial provisions, applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, spin-offs and share-for-share exchanges (collectively the restructuring provisions). The provisions apply both in cases of Greek and EU cross-border restructurings.

The provisions have been in force since January 1 2014, and have been applied to restructurings realised on the basis of corporate resolutions taken as of that date onwards. In this context, the lack of clear guidelines so far has created a misty tax regime that the issued Circular aims to clarify.

As a preliminary remark, the IAPR explicitly stipulates that the tax provisions under consideration do not affect the relevant corporate framework as defined by the applicable corporate legislation. Therefore, the restructuring provisions should be considered as regulating tax issues, without setting deviations nor additional requirements as regards the relevant corporate procedures, with the exception of the partial division that is an option provided only by the provisions of the GITC.

Furthermore, the IAPR has highlighted that application of the GITC restructuring provisions is optional for the taxpayer, since a business may opt to be subject to the general tax regime. In any case, the exercise of this option should be evidenced by any appropriate means, such as the respective corporate resolutions.

In addition, as regards the interpretation of the specific rules set by the provisions at hand, i.e. transfer of assets in exchange for securities – e.g. spin-offs and carve-outs – (Article 52 of the GITC), exchange of shares (Article 53 of the GITC) as well as mergers, divisions and partial divisions (Article 54 of the GITC), the Circular provided important clarifications on the requirements for their application as well as the tax benefits stemming therefrom.

In view of the above, the Circular has to a great extent contributed to the interpretation of the GITC restructuring provisions by setting the basic directions that had been missing for more than three years since the enactment of the latest GITC.

However, one should take into consideration the relevant targeted anti-avoidance provision (Article 56 of the GITC) as per which the tax benefits could be overturned in cases where the restructuring is effected for the main purpose (or where one of the main purposes is) to avoid or evade tax. The aforementioned anti-avoidance rule, combined with the fact that the Greek tax authorities have reserved the right to set additional requirements in order to avoid abuse of the restructuring provisions, could lead to the conclusion that there are still certain grey aspects of the Greek tax framework. To this end, the Greek tax administration could further elaborate these issues, especially in lack of administrative and judicial precedents, in order to create a safe, predictable and investor-friendly tax environment.

Diana Tsourapa (diana.tsourapa@gr.ey.com), Maroussi

EY

Tel: +30 210 2886 000

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article