Greece: Administrative guidelines published on tax benefits of cross-border restructurings

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Administrative guidelines published on tax benefits of cross-border restructurings

intl-updates-small.jpg
tsourapa.jpg

Diana Tsourapa

The Greek Independent Authority for Public Revenue (IAPR) has published Circular POL. 1057/2017 (the Circular), which sheds some light and provides the much anticipated administrative guidelines on the implementation of the Greek Income Tax Code (GITC) tax beneficial provisions, applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, spin-offs and share-for-share exchanges (collectively the restructuring provisions). The provisions apply both in cases of Greek and EU cross-border restructurings.

The provisions have been in force since January 1 2014, and have been applied to restructurings realised on the basis of corporate resolutions taken as of that date onwards. In this context, the lack of clear guidelines so far has created a misty tax regime that the issued Circular aims to clarify.

As a preliminary remark, the IAPR explicitly stipulates that the tax provisions under consideration do not affect the relevant corporate framework as defined by the applicable corporate legislation. Therefore, the restructuring provisions should be considered as regulating tax issues, without setting deviations nor additional requirements as regards the relevant corporate procedures, with the exception of the partial division that is an option provided only by the provisions of the GITC.

Furthermore, the IAPR has highlighted that application of the GITC restructuring provisions is optional for the taxpayer, since a business may opt to be subject to the general tax regime. In any case, the exercise of this option should be evidenced by any appropriate means, such as the respective corporate resolutions.

In addition, as regards the interpretation of the specific rules set by the provisions at hand, i.e. transfer of assets in exchange for securities – e.g. spin-offs and carve-outs – (Article 52 of the GITC), exchange of shares (Article 53 of the GITC) as well as mergers, divisions and partial divisions (Article 54 of the GITC), the Circular provided important clarifications on the requirements for their application as well as the tax benefits stemming therefrom.

In view of the above, the Circular has to a great extent contributed to the interpretation of the GITC restructuring provisions by setting the basic directions that had been missing for more than three years since the enactment of the latest GITC.

However, one should take into consideration the relevant targeted anti-avoidance provision (Article 56 of the GITC) as per which the tax benefits could be overturned in cases where the restructuring is effected for the main purpose (or where one of the main purposes is) to avoid or evade tax. The aforementioned anti-avoidance rule, combined with the fact that the Greek tax authorities have reserved the right to set additional requirements in order to avoid abuse of the restructuring provisions, could lead to the conclusion that there are still certain grey aspects of the Greek tax framework. To this end, the Greek tax administration could further elaborate these issues, especially in lack of administrative and judicial precedents, in order to create a safe, predictable and investor-friendly tax environment.

Diana Tsourapa (diana.tsourapa@gr.ey.com), Maroussi

EY

Tel: +30 210 2886 000

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
Gift this article