Switzerland: Swiss CFOs want to see increased tax competition by the cantons

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss CFOs want to see increased tax competition by the cantons

switzerland-thumb

More than 100 chief financial officers (CFOs) in Switzerland have said they want to see a comprehensive solution be developed when preparing the new Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III).

hess.jpg
stocker.jpg

Jackie Hess

Raoul Stocker

On February 12 2017, the Swiss electorate rejected CTR III in its proposed form. On the occasion of the quarterly CFO Survey of Deloitte, more than 100 chief financial officers (CFOs) in Switzerland were asked shortly after the vote what they now expect from a revised tax reform.

Although the content of the revised legislation is yet unknown, a new version of the reform will likely entail the undisputed elements of the rejected reform. More than 100 CFOs were questioned on their priorities as to which elements should be considered in the revised tax reform so that Switzerland remains, in their eyes, an attractive business location. The key findings were:

  • Of those surveyed, 87% of CFOs would like the law to grant the cantons extensive leeway for tax rate reductions;

  • Of those surveyed, 64% prefer to retain a generous tax deduction for research and development expenses. Moreover, 44% see the patent box regime as a suitable measure; and

  • The notional interest deduction was one of the most controversial measures of the rejected reform. Only 39% of the questioned CFOs see this as a suitable measure to be considered in a new law.

Swiss CFOs now expect political stakeholders to come up with a compatible solution and take the necessary time for it – irrespective of the EU/OECD deadline for abolishing the tax privileges of companies by 2019. The main findings were as follows:

  • Of those survey, 59% believe a legislative process in one piece to be launched as soon as possible is the most promising path. The new law should realistically come into force by 2020 or 2021;

  • Only about a third (30%) of respondents favour a two-step approach. The first step would abolish the tax privileges by 2019, combined with a solution for the transition, and the second step would present additional potential measures; and

  • The development of a completely new Swiss tax system (6%) or a "do-nothing" approach (6%) are basically not considered as an option.

The results show that Swiss CFOs are very much interested in an immediate and viable solution at the political level. However, rash decisions and interim solutions should be explicitly avoided. Rather, a comprehensive solution should be developed, which is well balanced and backed by the majority of stakeholders.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch) and Raoul Stocker (rstocker@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6312 and +41 58 279 6271

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article