New Zealand: Employee share scheme changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Employee share scheme changes

intl-updates-small.jpg
connolly.jpg
stewart.jpg

Shaun Connolly

Tim Stewart

The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2017-18, Employment and Investment Income, and Remedial Matters) Bill was introduced in New Zealand's Parliament on April 6 2017.

The bill proposes amendments to New Zealand's tax laws relating to the collection of employment and investment income information, reforms to the taxation of employee share schemes, and includes numerous other policy and remedial changes to New Zealand's tax legislation.

The proposals relating to the taxation of employee share schemes follow Inland Revenue's "Revenue Alert" on November 13 2015 and two rounds of public consultation in May and September 2016.

Under existing law, the taxation of schemes in which employees acquire shares in their employer is straightforward. In short, the amount of taxable income arising for an employee equals the market value of the shares acquired by the employee, less the amount paid or payable by the employee for those shares. That income is subject to tax at the employee's marginal tax rate in the income year in which the shares are acquired.

In recent years, Inland Revenue has challenged a number of share schemes, including on tax avoidance grounds, resulting in a degree of uncertainty regarding their tax treatment. Inland Revenue was concerned that Parliament's intention, that the taxable value of shares be determined at the time they are acquired, was being avoided due to the operation of some conditional reclassification schemes or the use of arrangements that were structured as share acquisitions but commercially and economically had features more akin to options.

Two key proposals relating to employee share schemes in the bill are:

  • Deferring the point of taxation for employees until the "share scheme taxing date", rather than the time of acquisition; and

  • Allowing employers a deduction for the provision of shares under a share scheme (limited to the extent to which the provision of shares gives rise to income for the employee).

The "share scheme taxing date" is defined to be the first date when under the scheme:

  • There is no real risk that beneficial ownership of the shares will change, or that the shares will be required to be transferred or cancelled (generally this will be at the end of any lock-up or vesting period);

  • The employee is not compensated for a fall in the value of the shares; and

  • There is no real risk that there will be a change in the terms of the shares affecting their value,

but if the benefits are cancelled or transferred to a non-associate before those events occur, then the "share scheme taxing date" is at the time of the cancellation or transfer.

The deferral of the taxing point will result in changes in value of the shares between their acquisition date and the share scheme taxing date being brought to tax in the hands of the employee. The employer will in most cases be entitled to a deduction for an equivalent amount.

The changes to the rules relating to employee share schemes (if enacted) will take effect from the date of enactment. However, Inland Revenue has acknowledged that share schemes are often long-term arrangements. Accordingly, the bill contains transitional provisions for existing and contemplated employee shares schemes. Generally, the new rules will apply to benefits under employee share schemes where the taxing point under the current rules, i.e. the acquisition of shares, has not occurred before six months after enactment of the bill.

Multinational corporations operating in New Zealand often offer participation in global share schemes to their New Zealand based employees. The terms of such global schemes are often not designed with New Zealand tax law in mind. The proposed changes (if enacted) will likely require the documentation disclosed to New Zealand based employees in respect of such global schemes to be updated to reflect the changes.

Shaun Connolly (shaun.connolly@russellmcveagh.com) and Tim Stewart (tim.stewart@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 4 819 7545 and +64 4 819 7527

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar one is still alive, it will apply to a smaller group of companies, Brian Foley also told ITR
Tax teams that centralise and automate their pillar two data will have a much easier time during reporting season, says Hank Moonen, CEO of TaxModel
While GCCs drive efficiency for multinationals, they also present a host of TP risks that should be considered carefully
PwC Ireland has also called for simplifying Ireland’s tax code and a reduction in its capital gains tax in a pre-budget submission
Effective audit management requires more than documentation; it’s the way taxpayers engage that can shape audit direction, manage procedural ambiguity, and preserve options for appeal or litigation
American advisers are falling short of client expectations when it comes to providing value-added services, but remaining tight-lipped won’t make the problem go away
Awards
The Social Impact Awards unveil new categories to reflect a changing legal and social landscape
Australia's approach to tax policy has undergone significant shifts in recent years, reflecting global trends and unique domestic considerations. These developments merit close attention from tax professionals
The UK has temporarily dodged the 50% rate due to a trade deal signed with the US in May; in other news, Ryan acquired a Northern Irish tax firm
Following a $28 million funding round, Aibidia wants to ‘double down’ on the US market via partnerships with the ‘big four’, the Finnish TP tech provider’s CEO tells ITR
Gift this article