Germany: Germany proposed limitations on tax deductibility of royalty payments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Germany proposed limitations on tax deductibility of royalty payments

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

The German government decided on January 25 to introduce a bill into the legislative process that would limit the deductibility of royalty payments between related parties for payments that become due after December 31 2017.

The bill is based on a draft law published by the federal Ministry of Finance at the end of 2016.

The draft law addresses royalty payments that are subject to a "low taxation" of the royalty income at the level of the recipient due to the application of intellectual property regimes such as IP, patent or license boxes. The law is directed at beneficial "non-nexus"-based IP regimes. Low taxation of royalty income based on the general taxation of the recipient would not fall within the scope of the proposed rules.

The restriction on deductibility would apply only to royalty payments made between related parties. The draft law also targets payments made to indirect recipients that benefit from a preferential non-nexus-based IP regime resulting in low taxation. This approach would result in the disallowance of deductions in back-to-back royalty structures where only an indirect recipient benefits from the regime.

Low taxation under the draft law generally means an effective tax rate of less than 25%. The determination of whether the income is low-taxed would be made in accordance with the rules in the Foreign Tax Act.

However, low taxation would not automatically result in a full disallowance of the deduction of the royalty payment. The percentage of the disallowed payment would be calculated based on the applicable tax benefit at the level of the recipient (i.e. the difference between the applicable tax rate and a 25% tax rate). For example, if the tax rate at the level of the recipient is 10%, 60% of the royalty payment (which is 15/25%) would be non-deductible for German tax purposes and if the non-nexus based IP-regime provided for a 0% tax rate, the full amount of the royalty payment would be non-deductible.

The draft law contains exceptions to the deduction limitation for royalty payments made to subsidiaries of the German licensee that trigger the German controlled foreign company rules at the level of the subsidiary and for payments regarding trademark rights based on the definition in the Trademark Act.

"Nexus-based" preferential tax regimes that would fall outside the scope of the proposed rule include regimes whose benefits depend on a substantial economic activity (e.g. R&D). The draft law provides that a substantial economic activity would not exist where the recipient of the royalty payment did not fully or predominantly develop the underlying IP in its own business operations (e.g. if the IP was developed by related parties or acquired).

The outcome of the legislative process is unclear. However, because the draft law is supported by the governing coalition at the federal level, chances that the draft law will be enacted seem high.

Affected taxpayers should carefully monitor the legislative process.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article