South Africa: South Africa tax amendments become effective in 2017

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: South Africa tax amendments become effective in 2017

foster.jpg

Dan Foster

Significant changes will enter into force in South Africa in 2017 after parliament approved the annual tax amendments in December 2016, some of which are discussed below.

Loans to trusts

To discourage avoidance of estate duty, the annual interest foregone on certain loans to trusts will, subject to certain exemptions, be treated as a donation made on the last day of the trust's tax year. This will apply after March 1 2017 to both existing and future loans.

Typically, such loans are used to purchase growth assets and cap the dutiable estate of the lender. The reference interest rate for this rule is the official rate of interest (8% on rand-denominated loans at present). Interest foregone below this rate will attract donations tax at 20% per year.

Loans to non-resident trusts by residents will, however, be excluded from the new deemed donation rule where such arrangements are subject to the transfer pricing provisions.

Employee share scheme dividends

Generally, local dividends are subject to a 15% withholding tax and foreign dividends are subject to an effective maximum income tax rate of 15%, whereas employee remuneration is subject to income tax of up to 41%.

Consequently, various anti-avoidance rules already exist to prevent the conversion of employee remuneration into dividends, typically via share schemes. These anti-avoidance rules will be extended further in 2017, with dividends received or accrued after March 1 2017 by or to employees in respect of certain equity instruments being taxed in full where such dividends arise from, or constitute, a share repurchase or redemption, or amounts derived on a company winding-up.

CFC group losses

South Africa imposes a sophisticated controlled foreign company (CFC) regime, subject to certain exemptions.

The so-called high tax exemption (HTE) applies to shield all income of the CFC from imputation to South Africa where the total foreign tax payable by the CFC is at least 75% of the notional South African tax that would have been due had the CFC been a South African tax resident.

The HTE foreign tax calculation requires losses other than the CFC's active year losses, including group losses, to be disregarded. The use by the CFC of such losses is effectively treated as foreign tax paid.

In this regard, it is important to note that South Africa does not operate a consolidated or group tax regime, but imposes corporate tax per entity.

Under the 2016 amendments, the HTE will be changed to delete the allowance of group losses so that where a CFC pays lower taxes in its jurisdiction as a result of group relief, only cash tax payable will be counted as foreign tax payable by the CFC. This amendment will proceed despite vociferous objections from practitioners and industry.

Consequently, a CFC that makes use of group loss relief in a foreign tax year commencing on or after March 1 2017 is extremely unlikely to qualify for the HTE, even though the tax rate in the foreign country may be similar to, or higher than, the tax rate in South Africa.

A CFC will still be able to disregard its own losses for purposes of the foreign tax calculation provided that such losses arose subsequent to the CFC becoming a CFC.

Dan Foster (dan.foster@webberwentzel.com)

Webber Wentzel

Tel: +27 11 530 5652

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
Gift this article