Chile: A new concept of deductible expenses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: A new concept of deductible expenses

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
A mere change in profitability will not, of itself, justify an exit charge

The tax authority under a formal and strict application of such criterion has rejected expenses that were perfectly reasonable from a business perspective.

In August, the Chilean government submitted to Congress a new Bill aimed at modernising the existing tax system.

One of the proposals is to amend the general requirements for an expense to be considered as tax deductible, and to introduce the new concept of special tax deductible expenses cases.

As per legislation already in force, an expense will be tax deductible provided that:

  • it is related to the business of the company;

  • it is necessary to produce taxable income;

  • it has not been deducted as part of the direct cost of goods or services of the company;

  • it is actually incurred in the relevant taxable period; and

  • it is adequately supported with appropriate documentation.

Expenses that fail to comply with the above requirements would be subject in principle to a 40% fine tax (rejected expense tax).

Even though the requirements for an expense to be tax deductible are included in the law, the practical implications of that provision derived mainly from the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (Chilean IRS) and the Chilean courts through their jurisprudence. For instance, the tax authority has construed that in order for an expense to be considered as 'necessary to produce income', it must be directly linked with the production of income, in the sense that it is mandatory/indispensable and that it cannot be avoided by the company.

The tax authority under a formal and strict application of such criterion has rejected expenses that were perfectly reasonable from a business perspective. For instance, the tax authority has defined that contractual fines would not be tax deductible as they are not indispensable or mandatory to produce income (even though they could be legally binding under a contractual arrangement) and could be avoided if the taxpayer properly complied with its contractual obligations.

Indeed, an update of Chilean tax legislation on this matter is urgently needed to provide a much clearer and reasonable legal framework for the deductibility of expenses.

The new Bill opens up discussion around this issue. According to the new requirements, an expense will be tax deductible provided it:

  • Is directly or indirectly linked to the business, including ordinary, extraordinary, habitual, exceptional, voluntary or obligatory expenses;

  • Is reasonable with respect to its amount;

  • Has not been deducted as cost;

  • Was actually incurred in the relevant taxable period;

  • Has a lawful cause and did not originate in malicious behaviour; and

  • Is adequately supported with appropriate documentation.

It will be interesting to see the Chilean Congress' position on this proposal. Furthermore, if passed in such terms, it will also be interesting to observe the tax authority's interpretation of the new requirements, particularly in reference to lawful cause or malicious behaviour concepts, which are more related to civil and criminal law and are not properly adapted for tax purposes.

The Bill is still in its early stages in Congress, and we expect an important discussion to be held around this and other topics covered therein. It is without a doubt a matter to be closely monitored in the following months.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article