Chile: A new concept of deductible expenses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: A new concept of deductible expenses

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
A mere change in profitability will not, of itself, justify an exit charge

The tax authority under a formal and strict application of such criterion has rejected expenses that were perfectly reasonable from a business perspective.

In August, the Chilean government submitted to Congress a new Bill aimed at modernising the existing tax system.

One of the proposals is to amend the general requirements for an expense to be considered as tax deductible, and to introduce the new concept of special tax deductible expenses cases.

As per legislation already in force, an expense will be tax deductible provided that:

  • it is related to the business of the company;

  • it is necessary to produce taxable income;

  • it has not been deducted as part of the direct cost of goods or services of the company;

  • it is actually incurred in the relevant taxable period; and

  • it is adequately supported with appropriate documentation.

Expenses that fail to comply with the above requirements would be subject in principle to a 40% fine tax (rejected expense tax).

Even though the requirements for an expense to be tax deductible are included in the law, the practical implications of that provision derived mainly from the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (Chilean IRS) and the Chilean courts through their jurisprudence. For instance, the tax authority has construed that in order for an expense to be considered as 'necessary to produce income', it must be directly linked with the production of income, in the sense that it is mandatory/indispensable and that it cannot be avoided by the company.

The tax authority under a formal and strict application of such criterion has rejected expenses that were perfectly reasonable from a business perspective. For instance, the tax authority has defined that contractual fines would not be tax deductible as they are not indispensable or mandatory to produce income (even though they could be legally binding under a contractual arrangement) and could be avoided if the taxpayer properly complied with its contractual obligations.

Indeed, an update of Chilean tax legislation on this matter is urgently needed to provide a much clearer and reasonable legal framework for the deductibility of expenses.

The new Bill opens up discussion around this issue. According to the new requirements, an expense will be tax deductible provided it:

  • Is directly or indirectly linked to the business, including ordinary, extraordinary, habitual, exceptional, voluntary or obligatory expenses;

  • Is reasonable with respect to its amount;

  • Has not been deducted as cost;

  • Was actually incurred in the relevant taxable period;

  • Has a lawful cause and did not originate in malicious behaviour; and

  • Is adequately supported with appropriate documentation.

It will be interesting to see the Chilean Congress' position on this proposal. Furthermore, if passed in such terms, it will also be interesting to observe the tax authority's interpretation of the new requirements, particularly in reference to lawful cause or malicious behaviour concepts, which are more related to civil and criminal law and are not properly adapted for tax purposes.

The Bill is still in its early stages in Congress, and we expect an important discussion to be held around this and other topics covered therein. It is without a doubt a matter to be closely monitored in the following months.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Gift this article