Poland: Poland widens definition of related parties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland widens definition of related parties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
sunflower-2881039-1280.jpg

Polish taxpayers will be able to apply new criteria to determine whether parties are related or not for tax purposes from 2019.

Polish taxpayers will be able to apply new criteria to determine whether parties are related or not for tax purposes from 2019. The new definition of "related parties" has been extended to include "significant influence".

The outcome may influence not only the scope of transfer pricing (TP) documentation, but also the tax deductible cost of group charges.

Transfer pricing regulations in Poland have been much stricter than elsewhere in Europe for many years. In most cases in Europe, only capital relations are reviewed while analysing arm's-length prices.

Until the end of 2018, Polish taxpayers were obliged to identify related parties not only based on capital relations (level of direct or indirect shares at 25%, and 5% until the end of 2016), but also in respect to control, management and family relations.

The new, wider definition seeks to include situations where structures are established in capital groups involving an investment fund, for instance, or a foundation or ownership structure specifically modeled on relations.

The idea of exerting "significant influence" is recognised if an individual has the actual ability to influence key business decisions of an entity.

In this respect, relations can also be identified in cases where a person has no formal authority or control in the government of an entity (e.g. at the board of directors or supervisory board level, for instance), and may significantly influence the strategic economic decisions made by the entity.

Examples stated by the legislator include making a decision to abandon a part of a business activity, implementing a new product in the market, taking over a part of a business from a related entity, and influencing the pricing strategy.

Therefore, "significant influence" can be identified in the case of an individual who could have a significant impact on the TP of an entity. The significant impact also exists in the case of family relations (being married, kinship, affinity, or second-degree affinity).

In practice, identifying a relation triggered by "significant influence" could be very challenging, cost-intensive and time-consuming for each organisation, particularly regarding cases featuring many departments.

For example, a number of entities that dispose of employees engaged in making business decisions, or cooperation with subcontractors, or those engaged in negotiations in business agreements, can face a dilemma regarding whether such employees could trigger relations with a subcontractor, for instance.

The new approach employed by tax administrations in new contexts remains to be seen.

In this respect, taxpayers in Poland should pay close attention to fulfilling all TP reporting obligations, and when making tax deductions on a related party's charges.

Transactions exceeding circa €690,000 ($790,000) per year are tax deductible only up to €690,000 + 5% earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amoritisation (EBITDA).

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article