Romania: Tax incentives introduced in 2014
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Tax incentives introduced in 2014

sincu.jpg

Gabriel Sincu

The Romanian economy has a great need for new investments to fulfil its huge growth potential. Whether direct or indirect, foreign or domestic, private or public, investments are key elements in the race to recover the economic gap existing between Romania and the western European countries. With this in mind, the Romanian authorities introduced in 2014 two sets of rules with the clear goal of increasing investment levels and making the country more attractive for new and existing players in the economy.

Tax exemption for capital gain and dividends

Starting January 1 2014, revenues from the sale of shares and from dividends received by Romanian companies are not taxable providing two conditions are met: the beneficiary of revenues is holding at least 10% of the shares in the company from which the revenues are derived; and the participation is held for an uninterrupted period of at least one year. Moreover, the facility is also available for revenues obtained from Romania by foreign companies registered in countries that have concluded double taxation treaties with Romania. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the new regulations offer interesting tax planning opportunities, considering that Romania has an extended network of double taxation treaties concluded with 84 countries around the world and that some of these treaties provides for advantageous tax treatments for investors.

There is one more element required to make this incentive fully operational in the Romanian economy: the tax ruling mechanism and procedures must be improved by the tax authorities, because for the time being there are still deficiencies in the system. As long as this is solved, the holding regulations (as they are known by the business environment) shall start showing their benefits towards investors.

Tax exemption for reinvested profits

For companies operating in Romania, a new facility has been available starting July 1 2014: the profits which are reinvested in new non-current assets falling under the category of industrial equipment are exempt from corporate income tax. The equipment acquired using this incentive has to be kept and used by the company for a period representing half of the useful life of each asset (but not more than five years).

From an accounting perspective, the reinvested profit has to be "frozen" in a reserve account and cannot be distributed as dividends. When the management of the company decides to distribute this profit the corporate income tax is due to the tax authorities. However, no interest or penalties for late payment are due.

It is worth mentioning that the tax exemption for reinvested profits is applicable only for the profits obtained by Romanian companies by December 31 2016. Hence, those interested in making use of this facility must consider this constraint.

Gabriel Sincu (gabriel.sincu@ro.ey.com)

EY Romania

Tel: +40 21 402 4000

Website: www.ey.com/ro

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
The new, fully integrated office will also offer M&A, dispute resolution, IP and corporate tax services
The new guidance concerns a recent 1% excise tax on the repurchases of corporate stock for both US and certain foreign companies
Interpath has hired a managing partner from rival accounting firm BDO to lead the new operation
Survey results of over 28,000 in-house lawyers reveal that American in-house counsel place a higher value on the reputation of external advisers than their peers elsewhere
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Andrew Leigh also endorsed new legislation designed to prevent multinationals using complex corporate structures to reduce taxes
Nick Crama and Parwesh Bissumbhar, senior director and manager respectively at Alvarez & Marsal, outline practical advice for real estate managers to comply with DAC6 regulations
The finalists for the 13th annual awards revealed
Survey results of over 25,000 in-house lawyers show competitive pricing and transparency in billing practices can help firms win clients
Gift this article