FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia changes tax treatment of uncollected loans
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia changes tax treatment of uncollected loans

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

The corporate income tax system in FYR Macedonia – since its groundbreaking revamping in 2011 – has been mostly concerned with the unrecognised (non-deductible) expenses of a company for the purposes of determining its tax base, as opposed to the actual profit of a company. However, within the past three years of the validity of this novel corporate income tax regime, and due to the resulting shrinking of the tax base of companies, the government and tax authorities are finding themselves in a constant loop of amendments aimed at widening the tax base by effectively introducing new categories in the so-called unrecognised expenses list.

Early in 2014, a change in the tax treatment of uncollected loan amounts was introduced. From January 31 2014, outstanding receivables' balances on loans granted from one resident entity to another, which haven't been collected within the same year that they were extended, are to be considered as written off during the year in question and to be thus regarded as unrecognised expenses for the loan-granting entity. Consequently, this results in the increase of the company's corporate income tax base. Thus, all inter-company loans extended after January 31 2014 are now subject to this change, with older loans not impacted by the amendment in any way.

It is worth noting that this change is only applicable to companies which are taxpayers in the sense of the standard corporate income tax regime (with 10% imposed on a tax base consisting of unrecognised expenses plus understated revenues plus any distributed profits) and does not impact companies which, due to their size, have opted to pay corporate income tax on a tax base of total revenue (at the rate of 1% on total revenues). Additionally, the above change impacts all inter-company loans, regardless of whether they are extended between related or unrelated entities.

One should keep in mind that, in addition to increasing the tax base in the year in which the loan receivables were not collected (thus increasing the amount of corporate income tax due), during the year in which loan receivables will in fact be collected, the tax base is to be decreased by the amount of the collection, thus enabling the taxpayer to pay less corporate income tax in the periods when they actually collect the loan amounts.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office

Tel: +389 2 2400225

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article