Chile: Proposed taxation on an attributed basis
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Proposed taxation on an attributed basis

winter.jpg

pelegri.jpg

Rodrigo Winter


Loreto Pelegrí

Chilean Income Tax Law provides for an integrated tax system consisting of a 20% corporate income tax rate applicable on an accrual basis and in case the company decides to distribute those profits to the final shareholders, they will be subject to either surtax (a progressive tax applicable on tax brackets to Chilean individuals being the highest tax bracket equal to 40%) or to additional withholding tax (a 35% withholding tax applicable to a foreign individual or corporation) on a cash basis, being the corporate tax already paid, a credit against the final tax. Under this mechanism, Chilean companies were able to defer the payment of the final taxes as long as they did not distribute dividends to its final shareholders being the company able to reinvest those amounts.

On April 1 2014 the Chilean government sent a Tax Reform Bill to the Congress proposing to amend many tax provisions of the Chilean Income Tax Law, the Tax Code, and other tax laws. This Tax Reform Bill is expected to become the biggest tax amendment in the past 30 years.

Among the changes, the Bill proposes a gradual increase of the corporate income tax currently assessed at 20% rate to 21% for year 2014; 22.5% for year 2015; 24% for year 2016 and 25% for year 2017.

The Bill also proposes to decrease the surtax higher tax bracket from the 40% rate to 35% equalise such rate with the additional withholding tax rate applicable to foreign corporations or individuals.

Moreover, from 2017 onwards, the Bill preserves the integrated tax system applying a 25% corporate tax rate at the company level and a further 35% at the final shareholders' level being the 25% already paid, a tax credit against either surtax or additional withholding tax. This 35% final tax rate will be applicable on an attributed basis regardless of a profit distribution from the company to the shareholders.

Since the final tax burden will correspond in many cases to 35% and the corporate tax credit will only correspond to 25%, the Bill creates a 10% withholding tax applicable at the company level in order to avoid that the final shareholder could end up by paying the difference in circumstances when no cash flow has been distributed.

Currently, there is a discussion in Congress regarding the lawfulness of applying taxes on profits which do not correspond yet to the shareholders since they have not been distributed and in some cases may never have been received.

Rodrigo Winter (Rodrigo.winter@cl.pwc.com) and Loreto Pelegrí (loreto.pelegri@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 294 00588

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
The new, fully integrated office will also offer M&A, dispute resolution, IP and corporate tax services
The new guidance concerns a recent 1% excise tax on the repurchases of corporate stock for both US and certain foreign companies
Interpath has hired a managing partner from rival accounting firm BDO to lead the new operation
Survey results of over 28,000 in-house lawyers reveal that American in-house counsel place a higher value on the reputation of external advisers than their peers elsewhere
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Andrew Leigh also endorsed new legislation designed to prevent multinationals using complex corporate structures to reduce taxes
Nick Crama and Parwesh Bissumbhar, senior director and manager respectively at Alvarez & Marsal, outline practical advice for real estate managers to comply with DAC6 regulations
Gift this article