Vietnam: The MOF changes its position on loan interest and VAT
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Vietnam: The MOF changes its position on loan interest and VAT

pham.jpg

Thuan Pham

In a turnaround from the guidelines in its previously issued Circular 6 (dated January 11 2012 and effective from March 1 2012), the Ministry of Finance (MOF) has changed its stance on whether interest on loans made by non-credit institutions is subject to VAT. Vietnam adopted its first Law on VAT in 2008 (as a replacement of its turnover tax). The law went into effect on January 1 2009, and specified which items were subject to VAT as follows:

"Goods and services used for manufacturing, business and consumption in Vietnam shall be the objects subject to value added tax, except for the objects stipulated in article 5 of this Law."

Article 5 states that the following goods and services shall not be subject to VAT: "…Credit services; securities business activities; assignment of capital; and derivative financial services including interest rate swaps, forward contracts, futures contracts, options, foreign currency sales and other derivative financial services as stipulated by law…'

Various government decrees issued as guidance for the implementation of the law confirmed that interest is not subject to VAT. However, the MOF's circulars, which detailed the law and its decrees, limited its interpretation, specifying that only interest on loans made by financial institutions or credit institutions as per Vietnamese law would not be subject to VAT. This was legally understood to mean that for non-credit institutions, any interest on loans made would be subject to VAT, although in practice, no tax authorities or taxpayers followed this interpretation.

However recently, to mitigate tax evasion through transfer pricing, Vietnamese tax authorities have conducted many audits, especially of foreign-owned enterprises. Shareholder loans have been one of the main points of interest. As a result, certain regulators and tax authorities have raised the issue as to whether the loan interest of non-credit institutions should be subject to VAT as per the MOF's circulars. To answer this, the MOF sought an opinion from the State Bank of Vietnam on "not-subject-to-VAT credit activities", including loans (and the interest generated by these) made by non-credit institutions. However, there was no agreement with the SBV, since from the SBV's perspective, credit activities (for example loans) can only be provided by credit institutions under Vietnam's Law on Credit Institutions (LOCI); loans made by non-credit institutions are not covered under the LOCI, and thus cannot be considered as "credit activities". As a result, the MOF issued Circular 6, which indicated that loan interest received by non-credit institutions is subject to VAT at the rate of 10%.

This new MOF clarification caught the attention of taxpayers, especially foreign-owned enterprises that have a shareholder loan structure already in place. As an indirect tax, it is not an actual cost to the lender, but cash flow could be an issue. Also, from a legal perspective, whether a particular good or service is subject to VAT should not be dependent on who sells or provides it. In principle, the subject of the VAT is the good or service, not the enterprise providing that good or service. A credit institution is also an enterprise doing business for profit. From a commercial perspective, loans made by both credit institutions and non-credit institutions have the same nature. A different treatment for VAT would not be reasonable and is unfair to taxpayers.

Given these facts, the MOF sought further instructions from the prime minister in August-2012. The prime minister agreed in principle that loan interest received by non-credit institutions is not subject to VAT (see Ruling 1551/TTg-KTTH dated September 26 2012). This is legally in line with the VAT law and Vietnam's Civil Code, which allows property loan transactions between parties. Article 471 of the Civil Code 2005 on contracts for property loans reads as below:

"A contract for property loan is an agreement between the parties whereby the lender transfers the property to the borrower; when the loan is due, the borrower must return to the lender the property of the same type in the same quantity and of the same quality, and shall have to pay the interest only if so agreed upon or provided for by law."

As such, loans made by non-credit institutions should be treated in the same way as those of credit institutions. Given this, the MOF has issued official letter 17164/BTC-TCT (dated December 11 2012) to tax departments for guidance on the prime minister's ruling. However, it is still unclear as to whether the ruling will be retroactive to March 1 2012. Regardless, one sure thing is that shareholder loans for most foreign-owned enterprises in Vietnam will now be subject to 5% withholding tax only (income tax portion).

Thuan Pham (thuan.pham@vdb-loi.com)
VDB Loi

Tel: +84 8 3914 7272

Fax: +84 8 3915 4248

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article