Poland: R&D tax deduction in Poland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: R&D tax deduction in Poland

intl-updates-small.jpg
dziedzic.jpg
tylenda.jpg

Monika Marta Dziedzic

Aleksandra Tylenda

The new easier application and higher amount of tax relief for research and development (R&D) is now available under the Polish tax system.

R&D is defined as a creative activity including scientific studies and development works. The R&D qualifying for tax deduction includes, not only traditional scientific studies, but also development works such as combining existing knowledge to improve manufacturing processes, increase efficiency or improve the quality of products or services, etc. Therefore, R&D relief is potentially available to all businesses that carry out improvements – it is not required to have a specific R&D department or operate in a special business sector.

The R&D tax relief provides a reduction of the corporate or personal profits by:

  • 50% of wages and social contributions of employees employed to carry out R&D (irrespective of the size of the company); and

  • 50% for small and medium size enterprises or 30% for larger ones, in the case of:

  • purchase of commodities and raw materials;

  • purchase of expert opinions, research and similar activities;

  • payments for use of research equipment;

  • depreciation of intangible assets and fixed assets, excluding passenger cars, buildings and constructions; and

  • payments for patent rights, protection rights for utility model, registration of the industrial design. However, for large companies the deduction of this last category of costs is not available.

R&D tax relief is available if :

  • The R&D incurred qualified costs that are not refundable;

  • The entrepreneur does not carry out business activity within a special economic zone in a given tax year;

  • R&D costs are recorded separately in tax accounting books; and

  • The entrepreneur concluded an agreement with a scientific unit (this requirement refers only to expenditure incurred on basic research defined as original research, experimental or theoretical works, undertaken mainly to acquire new knowledge without any direct commercial application or use in view).

R&D deductions are made in the tax return for the tax year in which the qualified R&D costs were incurred. If the taxpayer suffers a tax loss or if the taxpayer's income is lower than the amount of allowed deduction, the deductions – in the entire amount or in the remaining part – can be made in the tax returns for six tax years following the year in which the taxpayer incurred the qualified costs. Taxpayers starting their business activity and not able to make the deduction (due to low income or lack of income) may claim a cash incentive if certain requirements are met.

Monika Marta Dziedzic (monika.dziedzic@mddp.pl) and Aleksandra Tylenda (aleksandra.tylenda@mddp.pl)

MDDP, Poland

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Brazil appears to be adopting protocols to align national taxation with international standards, but recent changes are not immune from criticism, experts tell ITR
The US president did not have the authority to impose the tariffs, a court ruled; in other news, Fried Frank and Crowe Ireland made key tax hires
Pillar two considerations have become a fact of life for taxpayers everywhere, not least in Switzerland, where companies nonetheless continue to be active with investment
The Dutch TP software company’s co-founder tells ITR about speeding up documentation processes, following in Steve Jobs’s footsteps, and what makes tax cool
The ruling underscores the need for companies to provide robust and defensible valuations of intangible assets, one partner tells ITR
Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
Gift this article