Germany: Interest-free loans between foreign subsidiaries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Interest-free loans between foreign subsidiaries

schnitger.jpg

tranacher.jpg

Arne Schnitger


Philipp Tranacher

Interest-free loans can be found in group finance structures worldwide. In Germany, such loans are in principle not subject to transfer pricing adjustments as long as they are not granted cross-border. German tax law has few regulations on how the benefits from such interest-free loans are to be treated for German tax purposes. The Grand Senate of the Supreme Tax Court held on October 26 1987 (GrS 2/86) that the benefit from an interest-free loan between two foreign subsidiaries was a hidden distribution by the lender to the (German) parent company. The cost, though, was not an additional investment in the borrower but rather a tax deductible expense of the parent. This court decision was based on the former corporation tax imputation system.

The Supreme Tax Court confirmed in its decision of February 4 2014 (I R 32/12) that these principles still apply under the tax regime of the income exemption taxation method in force since 2001. The court's decision relates to the tax treatment of interest-free loans between German subsidiaries of the same German parent. Accordingly, the parent continues to be entitled to a deduction in the amount of the interest waived, while the benefit is a (largely tax-free) hidden distribution from the lender.

Although the facts and circumstances of the court case were domestic, the same principles should apply to investments abroad. Naturally, the foreign tax implications will also call for consideration.

Arne Schnitger (arne.schnitger@de.pwc.com) and Philipp Tranacher (philipp.tranacher@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 30 2636 5466 and +49 30 2636 4052

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
Gift this article