Chile aiming to join era of indirect tax on digital services

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile aiming to join era of indirect tax on digital services

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
3-digital-tax-570.jpg

As a rule, remuneration for services – digital or otherwise – rendered by a non-resident non-domiciled in Chile to Chilean taxpayers are subject to a withholding tax, with rates of up to 35% over the full paid amount depending on the type of service.

The tax is withheld, declared, and paid by the payer of the remuneration, independent of the means of payment.

Considering the number of users and different types of digital services (with various applicable rates), the Chilean tax system has a substantial flaw in how to control the compliance of such taxes; the investment required to assess every user and their payments exceeded the possible gains from such an assessment.

Enter the indirect tax on digital services.

A major tax bill was presented in Parliament on August 23 2018, entitled Modernisation of Tax Legislation. The bill proposes an assortment of changes, including a tax on digital services, which aims to resolve the abovementioned issues.

The proposed tax is characterised as a specific, indirect, and substitute tax, meaning that it only applies to a particular sector of the economy (i.e. digital services); the burden is easily passed on to consumers; and the tax replaces any other applicable tax, direct or indirect.

The tax rate is 10%, applicable to the full price paid by the consumer, and it is established by law that the withholding agent is the issuer of the electronic means of payment, i.e. the credit card issuer or online payment service provider.

Digital services means any digital intermediation activity between users and service providers (even if the final service is not digital), digital entertainment services (images, movies, videos, music, or games), marketing, and data storage (cloud storage).

The tax on digital services will coexist with the withholding tax exemption on standard software already present in Chilean legislation, and it remains to be seen how the Chilean IRS will apply it, especially considering that in their rulings, they have said that software-as-a-service benefits from the standard software exemption.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
Gift this article