Ireland: High Court to hear case on deductibility of foreign withholding tax
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ireland: High Court to hear case on deductibility of foreign withholding tax

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-matheson.png
intl-updates

The Irish Revenue Commissioners (Revenue) were successful in arguing before the Appeal Commissioners that no general trading deduction should be available for excess foreign tax incurred on royalties where an Irish tax credit was claimed for part of the foreign tax withheld. The decision is being appealed to the High Court.



Background

Under Irish tax law, credit is generally available for foreign tax withheld on royalty payments (regardless of whether the payment is received from a tax treaty partner jurisdiction or otherwise). However, the credit available is capped at the Irish tax that would be paid on the profit (calculated under Irish rules) attributable to the foreign royalty. This approach can often result in part of the foreign tax being unrelieved. The Appeal Commissioners in this case considered whether a general trading deduction was available to an Irish taxpayer for the excess unrelieved foreign tax.

The facts of the case

In this case, the taxpayer incurred foreign tax on a royalty received from a treaty partner jurisdiction. A tax credit was available under Irish law for part of the foreign tax incurred. The taxpayer sought to deduct the excess unrelieved foreign tax on the basis that the tax was part of the cost of doing business in the foreign country.

Revenue denied the deduction, arguing:

  • The withholding tax was in the nature of a tax on income and therefore could not be deducted; and

  • The tax was not "laid out or expended for the purposes of the trade", a basic requirement for trading deductions to be permitted under Irish law.

The taxpayer appealed the decision of Revenue to the Appeal Commissioners. By way of background, the Appeal Commissioners is an independent statutory body whose main task is hearing, determining and disposing of appeals against assessments and decisions of Revenue. Most Irish appeals on tax matters are first heard by the Appeal Commissioners.

Taxes in the nature of income tax not deductible

The analysis included in the decision of the Appeal Commissioner on this point is not entirely clear. There is some old case law in Ireland and the UK that concludes that foreign taxes on profits (or 'income taxes') are not deductible when calculating taxable profits. The taxpayer argued that as the foreign tax withheld from the royalty was calculated on the gross amount, it was not a tax on profits (or an 'income tax') and therefore that older case law did not apply.

The Appeal Commissioner rejected this position pointing to the claim for partial relief under the credit system as an acceptance by the taxpayer that the foreign tax was in the nature of an income tax. In addition, the Appeal Commissioner referred to a UK case that confirmed that a Venezuelan turnover tax could be regarded as a tax on profits even though the tax was applied by the Venezuelan authorities on a gross basis.

The Appeal Commissioner's analysis on the nature of the tax (which is critical to the outcome of the case) is somewhat opaque and it is hoped that when the case is considered by the High Court an in-depth review of this point will be included in the decision.

Not laid out or expended for the purposes of the trade

In determining whether the withholding tax was 'laid out or expended for the purposes of the trade', the Appeal Commissioner had regard to Harrods (Buenos Aires) v Gooby (HM Inspector of Taxes) [1963] 41 TC 450. That case concerned an Argentinean tax on the capital of a UK business operating in Argentina. The tax was held to be deductible. Failure to pay the tax could have resulted in the taxpayer being precluded from carrying on business in Argentina.

The Appeal Commissioner distinguished the Harrods case noting that the foreign withholding tax in the instant case did not "constitute a mandatory pre-condition to carrying out business in the source state the way the capital tax did in Harrods; it is simply a consequence of having carried out business in the source state". Overall, this appears to be a very high threshold to meet in order for any foreign tax to be treated as deductible and it will be interesting to see the High Court's position on the point.

High Court appeal

No date has yet been set for the High Court appeal. However, it is likely to be a case that will be closely watched by many corporate taxpayers operating in Ireland.

doohan.jpg
long.jpg

Brian Doohan

Olivia Long

Brian Doohan (brian.doohan@matheson.com) and Olivia Long (olivia.long@matheson.com)

Matheson

Tel: +353 1 232 2000

Website: www.matheson.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article