New Zealand: New Zealand introduces further measures affecting investment in residential property

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand introduces further measures affecting investment in residential property

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
intl-updates

The new Labour Party-led government formed late last year is implementing policies to dampen speculation in the residential property market.

The new Labour Party-led government formed late last year is implementing policies to dampen speculation in the residential property market. The cost of housing was topical in the lead up to last year's election and New Zealand has a benign tax regime for property investors and speculators that is perceived to have contributed to increasing house prices. Such investments are not subject to stamp duty or similar transaction taxes and, in many cases, gains on disposal would be non-taxable capital gains.

Extension of bright-line test

Before the introduction of the bright-line test in 2015, the sale proceeds of residential property were taxable only if the property was acquired as part of a business involving property dealing, acquired for the dominant purpose of resale, or in certain other specified circumstances. Because these tests depend to some extent on the intention of the taxpayer, it was in many cases difficult to determine whether a gain was taxable. The bright-line test was introduced to provide greater certainty. The test deems the proceeds of selling residential property (other than a person's main home) within a specified period of acquisition to be taxable. The specified period is two years.

The government has proposed extending that period to five years. Other than the change from two to five years, the details of the bright-line test will remain largely unaffected.

The five-year bright-line test will therefore have the following features:

  • The five-year period for the bright-line test runs from the date of settlement of the acquisition to the date a person enters into an agreement to sell the property;

  • The extended (five-year) bright-line test only applies to properties for which an agreement to purchase the property was entered into on or after the date the amendment comes into force (expected to be some time in the next two to three months);

  • The bright-line test applies only to residential land. Residential land includes empty land planned to be used for residential purposes, but excludes business premises and farmland;

  • The bright-line test does not apply to a person's main home. A person can only have one main home. The main home exception is available to properties held in a family trust;

  • There are exceptions for relationship property and inherited property;

  • Taxpayers are allowed deductions for expenditure on property subject to the bright-line test according to ordinary tax rules; and

  • Losses arising from the bright-line test are ring-fenced so they may be used only to offset taxable gains from other land sales.

A corresponding amendment will extend the specified holding period for the purposes of the residential land withholding tax (RLWT). The RLWT requires a vendor's conveyancer to withhold approximately 10% of the purchase price where the sale is of residential land subject to the bright-line test, and the vendor is an 'offshore RLWT person' (defined to include natural persons who are not New Zealand residents or citizens (or have been outside New Zealand for a certain period of time), or a company, trust or other body established outside New Zealand or meeting certain overseas ownership thresholds). A New Zealand resident for this purpose refers to a person holding a residence class visa under the Immigration Act (rather than tax residence).

The 'ban'on foreign buyers of residential property

A further measure introduced to dampen foreign speculation in New Zealand's property market is the so-called 'foreign buyer-ban' in respect of residential property. This measure is to be implemented by amendment to New Zealand's Overseas Investment Act.

The proposal, once implemented, will mean purchases of residential land by an overseas person (being a natural person that is neither 'ordinarily resident in New Zealand' [as defined] nor a New Zealand citizen, or that is a company, trust or other body established outside New Zealand or meeting certain overseas ownership thresholds) requires approval by the Overseas Investment Office. Under the proposals, such purchases will be approved only if:

  • The overseas person will be developing the land and adding to New Zealand's housing supply; or

  • The overseas person will convert the land to another use and is able to demonstrate that this would have wider benefits to New Zealand; or

  • The overseas person holds an appropriate visa and can show they have committed to residing in New Zealand.

It is expected that Australian and possibly also Singaporean nationals will be exempt from the new restrictions due to commitments New Zealand has made to those countries in trade and investment agreements.

brown.jpg
harker.jpg

Brendan Brown

Chris Harker

Brendan Brown (brendan.brown@russellmcveagh.com) and Chris Harker (chris.harker@russellmcveagh.com)

Russell McVeagh

Tel: +64 4 819 7748 and +64 4 819 7345

Website: www.russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article