Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Portugal: Personal income tax on cryptocurrencies: is the recent ruling a final take?

27 February 2018

Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.


The Portuguese tax authorities recently published Ruling 5717/2015 (ruling) covering the taxation of income derived from trading cryptocurrencies in Portugal, the taxation of which had been unclear since the recent boom in cryptocurrency trading.

Applying the 'schedular' system to categorise personal income tax (PIT) income from the sale of cryptocurrencies, the possibilities could be the following:

  • Business income category B – if derived as a continuing business activity performed on a regular basis (subject to generally applicable PIT progressive rates up to 48%);
  • Investment income category E – if considered as economic benefits arising from assets or rights, including derived from its transfer (subject to a flat rate of 28%); or
  • Capital gains category G – if derived from the sale of financial products as defined in Portuguese law (subject to a flat rate of 28%).

In the ruling, the Portuguese tax authorities took the position that:

  • The category G schedule contains a closed nomenclature list of the financial assets that give rise to capital gains (whenever disposed). As the list does not specifically include cryptocurrencies and such assets cannot be considered shares, derivatives or financial assets (valores mobiliários), the proceeds from the sale of cryptocurrencies do not qualify as capital gains;
  • The investment income category E aims to tax the "fruits or other economic benefits received directly or indirectly from the application of capital", including among other things, interest and dividends. Considering that the income in question arises from the sale of the cryptocurrency and not as an income generated from an asset, taxation under such investment income category would not apply; and
  • The business income category B is structured as covering any type of income arising from a reiterated business activity, undertaken towards obtaining business profits, and has priority as regards the above mentioned categories of income. Therefore, only if an individual trades in cryptocurrency within the concept of a business activity is the income derived from its sale taxable as business income.

The outcome of the ruling of non-taxation of this income has raised a debate in Portugal. The debate focuses on whether a change in the PIT would therefore be necessary to close this potential gap or whether the broad category E (investment income) should instead be 'reinterpreted' as a true residual taxable provision that seeks to tax any type of proceeds from the sale of assets, rights or legal positions, insofar as they do not qualify as capital gains under category G.

The ruling is clearly beneficial for taxpayers who dispose of cryptocurrencies (not as a business activity) but may prove short-lived, namely considering it only applies to the specific case presented to the tax authorities and is bound to trigger a reaction to close the gap. Nevertheless, beware as the ruling is unlikely to be the final take on cryptocurrencies in Portugal.

Tiago
Cassiano
Neves
Manuel
Abrunhosa

Tiago Cassiano Neves (tiago.cassiano.neves@garrigues.com) and Manuel Abrunhosa (manuel.abrunhosa@garrigues.com)
Garrigues
Tel: +351 231 821 200
Fax: +351 231 821 290
Website: www.garrigues.com






International Tax Review Profile

@hselftax And, following on, VAR is actually making some of the games a lot more interesting. 'Value-Adding Replays', one might say...

Jun 21 2018 05:07 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

@hselftax The World Cup is #Wayfair-er now that there's VAR #TaxTwitterWorldCup

Jun 21 2018 05:06 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

Tax chaos looms as US Supreme Court rules in favour of South Dakota in Wayfair case https://t.co/M4yEQAT2cX #wayfair #taxtwitter

Jun 21 2018 05:02 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

A new #Wayfair-style tax is applicable immediately in Louisiana following the Supreme Court's decision. This is the… https://t.co/Wi2yIwalgJ

Jun 21 2018 04:31 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @USSupremeCourt: SOUTH DAKOTA v. WAYFAIR, INC., ET AL.. Decided 06/21/2018 https://t.co/gy8M6dN94Y

Jun 21 2018 04:21 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents