Poland: Double deductions for R&D expenses become possible

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Double deductions for R&D expenses become possible

intl-updates-small.jpg

From January 1 2018, research and development (R&D) expenses may be deducted twice for tax purposes in Poland.

Besides many changes that, from January 1 2018, will significantly increase the income tax cost of Polish companies, there is one which may help to reduce the burden. It is the R&D tax allowance.

From January 1 2018, companies will be allowed, in addition to the regular deduction of such cost, to deduct them once again from a taxable basis, so there is an increase of the limit of deduction to 100% of eligible costs. There is no other limit for the R&D allowance.

It has been clarified that, in the case of R&D costs of employees, the eligible costs are salaries and social security contributions paid with respect to the employment relationship, in a part that time which an employee spends on R&D activity relates to the total working time of the month.

The catalogue of eligible R&D human work costs was extended to cover not only pure labour employment but also fees under specified task contracts and mandate contract, including related social security contributions, in a part that time which a contractor spends on R&D activity relates to the total working time of the month.

Also, the catalogue of eligible tangible R&D expenses was extended to cover the purchase of specialist equipment, in particular vessels and laboratory equipment and measuring devices that are not fixed assets.

However, with respect to eligible cost being expert opinions, it was clarified that only expert opinions, consultancy services and equivalent services, provided or performed on the basis of a contract with a scientific unit, as well as the acquisition of research results from such an entity, for the purposes of conducted R&D activities will qualify for the allowance.

The most expected change allowing the use of R&D tax relief for taxpayers conducting business on the basis of a permit in the special economic zone (SEZ) with respect to eligible costs that are not included in the calculation of the tax exempt income based on the SEZ permit was eventually introduced.

The R&D allowance can therefore be a useful and easy remedy to the increase of income taxation just introduced to Polish tax system.

Dziedzic

Monika Marta Dziedzic (monika.dziedzic@mddp.pl)

MDDP, Poland

Tel: +48 (22) 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article