Chile: Concept of beneficiary of a double tax treaty
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Concept of beneficiary of a double tax treaty

intl-updates-small.jpg
martinez.jpg
nunez.jpg

Gregorio Martínez

Ignacio Núñez

Chilean domestic law provides a withholding mechanism that requires the Chilean resident who pays a non-domicile or non-resident to withhold the amount of tax due and revert it to the tax authorities.

Before the latest tax reform, the law requested that in order to apply a double tax treaty (DTA) and, therefore, prevent withholding or perform a limited one, a residence certificate and a sworn statement of having no permanent establishment had to be presented. However, due to the tax reform, since January 1 2017, a provision was added that states the foreigner should also be a beneficiary of the DTA.

The Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently issued a ruling establishing their view over the concept "beneficiary of a DTA", explaining that the expression meant a person that in virtue of their residence can invoke the benefits established by the corresponding DTA regarding the corresponding income.

This confirms the criterion of the Chilean IRS that a resident of a contracting state, in the context of a DTA, is not always a synonym of beneficiary of a DTA.

The abovementioned criterion is closely related to the recommendations introduced by the Multilateral Convention to implement tax treaty related measures to prevent base erosion and profit shifting related to the prevention of treaty abuse. These recommendations have been incorporated in the latest DTAs subscribed by Chile.

In line with the above and acting in accordance with Action 6 of the BEPS action plan, a principal purpose test clause was introduced in Chile's DTAs with Japan and Italy. Limitation of benefits clauses were introduced in DTAs held with Uruguay and Argentina.

The inclusion of these clauses in DTAs improves the control and assessment of international tax planning, but the practical effects should also be considered. These clauses establish a very important burden on the withholding agent, where they will have to request a no PE declaration, a certificate of residency of the foreign taxpayer and perform a tax analysis of such taxpayer to apply principal purpose test or limitation of benefits clauses. However, technicalities are involved, but not every withholding agent has familiarised themselves with these – they should do so now.

Gregorio Martínez (gregorio.martinez@cl.pwc.com) and Ignacio Núñez (ignacio.nunez@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 2940 0000

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article