Poland: R&D tax deduction in Poland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: R&D tax deduction in Poland

intl-updates-small.jpg
dziedzic.jpg
tylenda.jpg

Monika Marta Dziedzic

Aleksandra Tylenda

The new easier application and higher amount of tax relief for research and development (R&D) is now available under the Polish tax system.

R&D is defined as a creative activity including scientific studies and development works. The R&D qualifying for tax deduction includes, not only traditional scientific studies, but also development works such as combining existing knowledge to improve manufacturing processes, increase efficiency or improve the quality of products or services, etc. Therefore, R&D relief is potentially available to all businesses that carry out improvements – it is not required to have a specific R&D department or operate in a special business sector.

The R&D tax relief provides a reduction of the corporate or personal profits by:

  • 50% of wages and social contributions of employees employed to carry out R&D (irrespective of the size of the company); and

  • 50% for small and medium size enterprises or 30% for larger ones, in the case of:

  • purchase of commodities and raw materials;

  • purchase of expert opinions, research and similar activities;

  • payments for use of research equipment;

  • depreciation of intangible assets and fixed assets, excluding passenger cars, buildings and constructions; and

  • payments for patent rights, protection rights for utility model, registration of the industrial design. However, for large companies the deduction of this last category of costs is not available.

R&D tax relief is available if :

  • The R&D incurred qualified costs that are not refundable;

  • The entrepreneur does not carry out business activity within a special economic zone in a given tax year;

  • R&D costs are recorded separately in tax accounting books; and

  • The entrepreneur concluded an agreement with a scientific unit (this requirement refers only to expenditure incurred on basic research defined as original research, experimental or theoretical works, undertaken mainly to acquire new knowledge without any direct commercial application or use in view).

R&D deductions are made in the tax return for the tax year in which the qualified R&D costs were incurred. If the taxpayer suffers a tax loss or if the taxpayer's income is lower than the amount of allowed deduction, the deductions – in the entire amount or in the remaining part – can be made in the tax returns for six tax years following the year in which the taxpayer incurred the qualified costs. Taxpayers starting their business activity and not able to make the deduction (due to low income or lack of income) may claim a cash incentive if certain requirements are met.

Monika Marta Dziedzic (monika.dziedzic@mddp.pl) and Aleksandra Tylenda (aleksandra.tylenda@mddp.pl)

MDDP, Poland

Tel: +48 22 322 68 88

Website: www.mddp.pl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article