South Africa: South African Budget 2017

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: South African Budget 2017

bennett.jpg

Anne Bennett

On February 22, the South African Minister of Finance delivered the 2017 budget, which proposed raising an additional ZAR 28 billion ($2.2 billion) primarily by collecting ZAR 16.5 billion more in personal taxes and ZAR 6.8 billion through an immediate increase in the dividend withholding tax rate from 15% to 20%. Apart from any treaty relief, profits extracted from South African companies will now suffer an effective rate of 42.4% (up from 38.8%) once 28% corporate tax and 20% dividends tax is accounted for.

The top individual tax rate is also increasing from 41% to 45% with a corresponding increase in the capital gains tax (CGT) rates for individuals and trusts from 16.4% and 32.8% to 18% and 36%, respectively. Although no changes were proposed to corporate tax rates, proposals likely to increase tax payable by companies were announced, many of them targeted at perceived tax avoidance strategies.

Dividends are generally exempt from income tax and it is proposed that structures seeking to take advantage of this, such as the use of share buybacks (classified as dividends) rather than share sales which would trigger CGT, will be targeted. Dividend stripping rules already exist to reclassify otherwise exempt "dividends" as taxable, where a company borrows funds from its prospective purchaser in order to declare a dividend to its shareholder (seller) prior to the sale of the shares in the company. These rules are likely to be broadened to apply irrespective of the source of the borrowing used to fund the dividend.

Not surprisingly in this BEPS environment, the theme of tax avoidance was also a key focus in the cross-border context.

New rules may be introduced to limit situations in which distributions from a South African company to non-resident shareholders can be classified as tax exempt repayments of capital rather than as dividends subject to dividends tax. With regard to controlled foreign corporations (CFCs), a fresh attempt will be made to draft legislation targeting structures in which trusts are interposed between South African taxpayers and foreign companies, resulting in those foreign companies escaping the ambit of South Africa's CFC rules.

The Treasury also announced that South Africa will sign the OECD Multilateral Instrument in June 2017 and will adopt the principal purpose test (PPT) because it is the preferred measure to prevent treaty abuse. The Treasury believes the PPT approach is appropriate because the wording of this test aligns with the wording of the "sole or main" purpose test found in South Africa's domestic General Anti Avoidance Rule.

The tax exemption that applies to foreign earnings of South African tax resident employees working abroad for more than 183 days in any 12-month period, including a continuous period exceeding 60 days, is narrowing. Going forward, this exemption will only be available if the employee pays tax on the foreign earnings in another country.

On a more positive note, it was announced that the regulatory framework regarding cross-border intellectual property (IP) transactions will be relaxed in light of unintended challenges that are making South Africa uncompetitive as a jurisdiction in which to develop and own IP. The relaxation will involve amendments to the related income tax provisions and exchange control policies.

More detail in regard to all of the proposals mentioned above will only be available when the first round of related draft legislative amendments is released for comment later this year.

Anne Bennett (anne.bennett@webberwentzel.com)

Webber Wentzel

Tel: +27 11 5305886

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article