Germany: Fiscal Court rules substance requirements under Cadbury-Schweppes exception to CFC taxation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Fiscal Court rules substance requirements under Cadbury-Schweppes exception to CFC taxation

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

Germany's controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules apply to CFCs earning passive income that is taxed at a rate of less than 25%. However, the rules do not apply to subsidiaries located in the EU/EEA if the Germany taxpayer can demonstrate that the subsidiary carries on a genuine economic activity in its state of residence (Cadbury-Schweppes exception, see ECJ, C-196/04). There is scant case law on what constitutes a genuine economic activity for these purposes.

In a recent case before the Lower Fiscal Court of Münster, a Cyprus-resident subsidiary of a German parent company had office space available and one resident employee in Cyprus. The Cyprus entity was engaged in the acquisition of publishing rights for Russian and Ukrainian books; the authors contracted with the Cyprus entity, which then granted an intercompany licence for an arm's-length royalty paid to group subsidiaries in Russia and Ukraine. There was contact between the authors and the publishing group through the local subsidiaries, but the authors contracted only with the Cyprus entity. The royalties were considered passive income and were benefited from low taxation in Cyprus.

The Münster court held that interposing the Cyprus entity to receive the royalties paid by the Russian and Ukrainian subsidiaries instead of the German parent constituted a wholly artificial arrangement because the entity did not conduct a genuine economic activity in Cyprus. The court held that the entity did not use the local resources and the German taxpayer failed to present sufficient business reasons why the licensing activities had to be performed in Cyprus (rather than Germany). Some of the court's conclusions regarding the scope of the EU freedom of establishment and the impact of outsourcing seem questionable. As the decision was appealed, the Federal Tax Court will have the final say on the issue (pending case reference I R 94/15).

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de); and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New hires from rivals are reportedly being axed from the firm, following a steep decline in profits
Following Richard Houston’s switch to the newly formed Deloitte EMEA, Graves has the opportunity to bring Deloitte’s tax practice up to speed with its rivals
Firms announced tax hires and promotions across Europe and the US, while fresh figures from Ireland showed corporation tax receipts edging down in the first quarter
The country has overseen better audit procedures and demonstrated commitment to acting as a 'regional leader' on international tax matters, the OECD said
Barrister Setu Kamal and policy guru Dan Neidle have clashed over the former’s legal action against Google, described as ‘bonkers’ by Neidle
Authors from Khaitan & Co evaluate the recent CBDT notification, whereby legacy investments made by investors continue to be exempt from the applicability of GAAR
Dual-qualified corporate tax specialist Christoph Schimmer joins the firm after stints at Deloitte, Cerha Hempel and DLA Piper
Geopolitical rivalry is reshaping global tax cooperation, as the OECD’s minimum tax framework fragments and the EU grapples with the ensuing legal fallout
LED Taxand’s partner tells ITR about entrepreneurial inspirations, the importance of people skills, and what makes tax cool
Shiny new offices like Ryan’s in London Bridge aren’t just a cost – they signal that a firm is willing to align with its clients’ interests
Gift this article