Germany: EGC rules German exception to change-in-ownership rule qualifies as unlawful state aid

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: EGC rules German exception to change-in-ownership rule qualifies as unlawful state aid

Linn
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

On February 4 2016, the European General Court (EGC) issued a decision upholding the 2011 decision of the European Commission that the 'restructuring exception' in Germany's rules relating to the carryforward of tax losses by companies in financial difficulties constituted illegal state aid under EU law.

Under the change-in-ownership rules, a direct or indirect share transfer of more than 25% and up to 50% (or of more than 50%) of the shares in a company that has loss carryforwards results in a pro rata (or full) forfeiture of the carryforwards. One of the few exceptions to this rule was the restructuring exception, which granted relief for built-in gains and for certain acquisitions of businesses that are in distress, subject to a number of conditions.

The European Commission regarded the relief for distressed businesses as unlawful state aid and requested the German Government not to apply the rule in existing and open cases. The government objected but lost its case before the EGC for procedural reasons. The case against the European Commission then was brought to the EGC by several taxpayers in separate cases of which two have now been decided. Both taxpayers had obtained binding rulings from the German tax authorities confirming their entitlement to future loss offsets despite harmful changes in ownership. The rulings were withdrawn after the European Commission made its request to the German government.

The EGC held that the general rule requires the forfeiture of loss relief on a change-in-ownership and the exception confers a selective advantage on the beneficiary without regard to individual circumstances and, therefore, prefers certain (distressed) companies over their competitors. The court rejected the argument that the change-in-ownership provisions were intended to prevent the abusive practice of buying tax loss companies, whereas the exception was designed to assist distressed companies, because a rescue attempt was not the only non-abusive share acquisition in a loss-making company. The decision of the EGC was appealed by at least one of the taxpayers so that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will have the final word on the matter (case ref. C-203/16 P).

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

For many taxpayers, the prospect of long-term certainty that a bilateral APA offers can override concerns about time, cost and confidentiality
Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
The deal to acquire ITR's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
JBS, the biggest meat company in the world, allegedly used Luxembourgian ‘mailbox companies’ to avoid taxes between 2019 and 2022
Despite the conviction of Jessa Dabalos, the Tax Practitioners’ Board’s investigative work continues with five outstanding PwC scandal probes
Heads of tax need to push their teams forward as strategic business advisers to add value across their organisations, says Sandy Markwick
Scott Bessent reportedly felt undermined by Musk naming Gary Shapley as acting IRS commissioner; in other news, Baker Tilly will combine with a top 15 US firm
The promise of nine years’ tax certainty and a ‘rational and pragmatic’ government process makes APAs a no-brainer, Indian tax advisers tell ITR
Despite garnering significant revenues from multinationals, Italy’s digital services tax presents pressing double taxation issues, say Stefano Simontacchi and Francesco Saverio Scandone of BonelliErede
ITR’s research shows that in-house tax counsel in Asia also feel underserved by their advisers’ international networks
Gift this article