China: China’s new VAT rates and rules across all industries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: China’s new VAT rates and rules across all industries

ho-khoonming.jpg
lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Lewis Lu

On March 24 2016, China's Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation jointly issued Circular Cai Shui [2016] 36 (Circular 36) which contains the Value Added Tax (VAT) rates and rules applicable to the expansion of China's VAT system to several key sectors such as real estate and construction, financial services, and lifestyle services, which take effect from May 1 2016.

China's indirect tax system has, for many years now, been a bifurcated system with VAT broadly applying to the goods sectors, and Business Tax (BT) applying to the services sectors. Given that BT is essentially a tax on business which cascades throughout a supply chain, and is generally regarded as being an inefficient form of taxation, the Chinese government has been embarking upon a programme of progressively replacing BT with VAT since 2012. While the early stage of the VAT reform programme involved the VAT rules for certain sectors being implemented progressively on a province-by-province basis, in more recent times the implementation of VAT has been done nationwide on an industry-by-industry basis.

This final stage represents a 'big bang' approach, with all remaining sectors transitioning from BT to VAT nationwide with effect from May 1 2016, and they are:

  • Real estate and construction;

  • Financial services; and

  • Lifestyle services, which encompasses hospitality, food and beverage, healthcare, education, cultural and entertainment services, and a general residual category of any other services which are still subject to BT.

These three key industries represent, in policy terms, the most difficult industries to apply a VAT to, and moreover, in financial terms they are the most significant industries contributing to local government revenues. From a policy perspective, they can present challenges in applying a VAT to their services, given that:

  • the value added in financial services can be difficult to measure on a transaction-by-transaction basis, which explains why most countries exempt them from a VAT;

  • gains from real estate transactions may arise from passive activity (that is, simple increases in property values), or from actively improving the property, such as building and construction. The real estate industry also affects a broad range of stakeholders, from experienced developers, to investors, to speculators and private individuals. It is also subject to many other types of taxation already; and

  • lifestyle services can be consumed for business purposes or for private purposes, and differentiating between them can be difficult. In many cases they are also primarily cash based businesses where tax compliance may not be high.

When fully implemented, China's VAT system will be one of the broadest-based systems among more than 160 countries in the world which have now implemented a VAT (or equivalent tax). China's VAT system will be unique by international standards in applying VAT to virtually all financial services (including interest income), and in applying VAT to real estate transactions involving not only B2B and B2C transactions, but C2C as well – an outcome not known to exist in any other country. It would not be surprising to see other governments follow China's lead and expand their VAT systems, especially if China is able to implement these changes successfully.

For more insight into the BT2VAT initiative, visit www.internationaltaxreview.com for information put together for ITR by the Chinese SAT and Minister Wang Jun.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Clients are facing increased TP audit scrutiny in Hungary. DLA Piper Hungary is therefore using AI and advanced analytics to augment its advice, the firm’s head of TP says
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and MinterEllisonRuddWatts were among the firms that advised on the deal
AI will mean fewer entry-level roles in tax but also the emergence of new jobs, according to tax expert Isabella Barreto
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on standout performances by PwC, KPMG and Deloitte across the Asia-Pacific region
The partnership model was looking antiquated even before the UK chancellor’s expected tax raid on LLPs was revealed. An additional tax burden may finally kill it off
The US’s GILTI regime will not be forced upon American multinationals in foreign jurisdictions, Bloomberg has reported; in other news, Ropes & Gray hired two tax partners from Linklaters
APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Gift this article