Chile: Change of scenery: Chilean tax assistance and transparency

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Change of scenery: Chilean tax assistance and transparency

Benedetto-Sandra
Lopez

Sandra Benedetto

 Ignacio Nunez

As the framework for the global exchange of information regarding investments abroad is being moulded, Chile – as the only South American member of the OECD – has been highly committed to applying such principles and, in order to promote tax assistance and transparency, has signed international conventions and reformed domestic legislation at a legal and administrative level.

Improving international assistance

Chile signed the Convention of Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters in October 24 2013. Even though the aforementioned convention is not yet enforceable in the country, it has been passed by the Chilean Congress and is just awaiting presidential promulgation.

Meanwhile, and on the understanding of creating a common framework, two instruments have been signed by Chile: the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information (CRS MCAA), signed in June 2015; and the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of Country-by-Country Reports (CbC MCAA), signed in January 2016.

Related to the CRS MCAA, Chile would be required to send financial information since September 2018 onwards regarding commercial year 2017.

Even though a specific date has not been provided in order to submit the CbC MCAA, it has been recommended by the final report on Action 13 of the BEPS Project, to provide the first country-by-country (CbC) report by December 31 2017 with the information pertaining to fiscal year 2016.

It is expected that once the convention becomes enforceable, the Chilean IRS will proceed to regulate the implementation of the convention. Independently of those modifications, Chile has already made some administrative and legal modifications in accordance with the OECD principles and the BEPS Project.

Disclosure of investments abroad in Chilean Legislation.

At an internal legislation level, since Tax Reform Act No. 20.780 of September 2014, Chile has implemented different procedures in order for taxpayers to inform their investments abroad. As an example, a tax amnesty programme was available during 2015, which received 7,832 declarations, increasing the available information for the Chilean IRS.

As part of these policies and in order to keep an updated register of investments abroad, in December 2016 the Chilean IRS issued a resolution extending the obligation to inform investments, insurances, assets and other operations abroad and related gains in Affidavit No. 1851, which applies to taxpayers whose yearly investments exceeded $100,000 (previously this obligation only applied to taxpayers whose incomes surpassed the amount of $1,000,000). The aforementioned affidavit must be submitted by taxpayers by June 30 2016 and is subject to a penalty which can ascend to approximately $800.

The Chilean IRS has made some adjustments related to the CbC MCAA by creating Affidavit No. 1913 (affidavit of global tax characterisation) on December 2016, which has to be filed yearly by certain companies (for the most part this applies to big companies and major taxpayers), indicating if they are part of a holding company and detailing international transactions conducted during the previous year (with a series of other obligations that goes beyond such information request).

Finally, from 2017 onwards and under the new taxation regime applicable in Chile, taxpayers under the attributed or semi-integrated regime must inform to the Chilean IRS, by June 30 of each year, of the investments made abroad during the previous year, indicating the amounts, the type of investments, the country in which the investments were made, the percentage of participation over those entities and its destination. The penalty in this case will consist of a fine and the possibility to consider those investments as withdrawals of profits, subject to a sole tax of 40%.

We must indicate that these are just some of the current requirements or newly-introduced procedures by Chilean tax legislation, as there are other multiple obligations that are directly and indirectly related to the adoption of these principles. Therefore, this is a matter that we expect to continue to evolve swiftly and therefore should be tracked closely by any taxpayer performing cross-border operations with Chile.

Sandra Benedetto Back (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com) and Ignacio Nunez (ignacio.nunez@cl.pwc.com) 

PwC

Website: www.pwc.cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
A ‘joint understanding’ among G7 countries that ‘defends American interests’ is set to be announced, Scott Bessent claimed
The ‘big four’ firm’s inaugural annual report unveiled a sharp drop in profits for 2024; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Perkins Coie expanded their US tax benches
Representatives from the two countries focused on TP as they met this week to evaluate progress under a previously signed agreement – it is understood
The UK accountancy firm’s transfer pricing lead tells ITR about his expat lifestyle, taking risks, and what makes tax cool
Dolphin Drilling intends to discuss the final liability amount and manner of settlement with HM Revenue and Customs
Winning the case against the 20% VAT imposition was always going to be an uphill challenge for the claimants, UK tax advisers argue
Gift this article