EU: Member states agree to implement BEPS Action 13 CbCR by EU-wide Directive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Member states agree to implement BEPS Action 13 CbCR by EU-wide Directive

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

In the public session of the ECOFIN Council meeting of March 8 2016, the EU's 28 finance ministers reached political agreement on a Dutch EU Council Presidency draft compromise text on the EU Commission's draft Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (between EU tax administrations), also known as 'DAC4'.

The political agreement concerns the proposed legislative amendment as part of the EU Commission's January 2016 EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Package in order to enable the coordinated integral implementation of G20/OECD BEPS Action 13 country-by-country reporting (CbCR) requirements in EU law.

DAC4 will apply to FY 2016 onwards. However, at the request of the German Finance Minister, it was agreed to defer by one year the Directive's specific provisions governing the secondary reporting mechanism (that is, mandatory and automatic CbCR by EU subsidiaries of parent multinational companies which are not EU tax residents) – these will apply from FY 2017 onwards. The Germans insisted on this amendment in order to ensure a level playing field between EU and non-EU countries and for the EU to be more in line with planned BEPS Action 13 implementation in other major territories like the US.

The text of DAC4 will be finalised by the Dutch six-monthly rotating EU Council Presidency to reflect the political agreement and then be translated into all 23 official languages of the EU.

Two EU legislative procedural formalities still need to be cleared before the Directive can also be formally adopted unanimously by the ECOFIN Council: first the lifting of the pending UK Parliament's reservation on the agreed compromise text and, secondly, the formal adoption by the EU Parliament's consultative Opinion on the Commission's DAC4 proposal dated April 28 2016.

The EU Parliament is expected to adopt its Opinion on DAC4 in its plenary session of May 10 2016.

DAC4 is expected to be formally adopted in the ECOFIN Council of May 25 2016, and formally enters into force 20 days after publication in the EU's Official Journal.

EU member states will then have 12 months to transpose the new rules into national law, by mid-2017.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC EU Public Affairs-Brussels

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com/eudtg

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Whether it be due to a fragmented advisory market or a rise in M&A, Italy’s frenetic hiring has not gone unnoticed by ITR’s Talent Tracker
The deal gives Azets 14 new partners and boosts its Swedish revenues to over $100 million; in other news, Svalner Atlas launched in Copenhagen
The tax technology company will be providing a free demonstration of its OTP software and offering best practice advice on whether to ‘buy or build’ on September 8
Johanes Glorinus Saragih of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxes outlines the nation’s delicate geopolitical situation, as it sits between a rock and a hard place with the US and pillar two
The law firm’s head of tax, trade and wealth management likens tax legislation to a complex puzzle, recommends a sturdy coffee mug, and explains why acronyms make tax cool
The global tax and accounting firm has appointed two experienced TP advisers from a New Jersey-based boutique
A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Gift this article