Brazil: Update on the obligation to disclose certain transactions in Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Update on the obligation to disclose certain transactions in Brazil

Oliveira-Julio
Gottberg-Ruben

Julio Oliveira

Ruben Gottberg

On November 17 2015, the Brazilian Congress approved the project for conversion into law of the Provisional Measure 685/2015 (PM 685/2015), without the articles intended to impose an obligation to disclose tax planning transactions.

PM 685/2015 was released by the Brazilian government on July 21 2015 and introduced, among other provisions, rules concerning the disclosure of certain transactions to the Brazilian Internal Federal Revenue Service (RFB).

In Brazil, a PM is a temporary executive order issued by the executive branch of the government. A PM has the authority of law, but it requires formal conversion into law by the Congress within a 60-day term. If Congress does not act within this initial term, then the measure expires unless extended for an additional 60-day term (such extension can only occur once). On September 9 2015, the Brazilian Congress extended the PM 685/2015 for an additional 60-day term (no further extensions are now permitted).

During the legislative process for converting PM 685/2015 into law, the legislators considered imposing an obligation to disclose tax planning operations resulting in suppression or reduction of taxes.

After extensive discussions involving the legality of tax planning in Brazil and the extension of RFB's powers, which is evidenced by repetitive moving back and forth between the upper and the lower chambers of the Congress, the law project was approved on November 17 2015. Interestingly, the final draft was approved without the articles intended to impose an obligation to disclose tax planning transactions.

The newly converted law will now be submitted for Presidential assent, which may only veto or approve it, without the possibility to reintroduce the provisions excluded by the Congress.

Julio Oliveira (julio.oliveira@br.pwc.com) and Ruben Gottberg (ruben.gottberg@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674 2276

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article