Germany: Federal Tax Court rules CFC income is not subject to trade tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Federal Tax Court rules CFC income is not subject to trade tax

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

Germany's Federal Tax Court (BFH) issued a decision (case reference I R 10/14) on March 11 2015 in which it held that controlled foreign company (CFC) income is not subject to German trade tax. The BFH concluded that CFC income constitutes deemed income of a foreign permanent establishment (PE) for German tax purposes and, thus, is deductible from the trade tax base. The BFH overturned a 2012 decision of the lower court of Düsseldorf (16 K 2513/12), putting to rest a long-standing controversy on this issue. Under Germany's CFC rules, CFC income arises if a foreign subsidiary that is controlled by German shareholders earns low-taxed passive income. Any income that is not included in an exhaustive list of active income would be deemed passive income (passive income would include, but is not limited to, interest and most types of royalty payments). The low-taxation threshold is set at 25% even though Germany reduced the corporate income tax rate from 25% to 15% in 2007. CFC income is taxed currently in the hands of the German shareholders as a deemed dividend, to which exemptions and other dividend relief mechanisms do not apply. Even though CFC income is included in the corporate tax income base and, thus, also in the starting point for the income calculated for trade tax purposes, any foreign tax paid by the CFC is creditable only against corporate income tax and not against trade tax, so the application of the CFC rules could lead to incongruous results. Referring to the territorial scope of German trade tax, the court held that CFC income can be seen as income deemed to arise in a foreign permanent establishment which has to be eliminated from the trade tax base.

As a consequence, CFC income attributed to German entities would only be taxed at a 15.825% rate (corporate income tax, including the solidarity surcharge). It remains to be seen if and how the legislator will react to this decision.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article