Australia: Hockey announces 2015-2016 Budget

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Hockey announces 2015-2016 Budget

mccormack.jpg

Jock McCormack

The Australian Government released a measured but significant 2015-2016 Federal Budget on May 12 2015. The three main tax changes include a focus on multinational tax avoidance by introducing new targeted non-resident anti-avoidance measures and penalties, changing the goods and services tax (GST) to apply to intangible supplies made by non-residents (including digital content) and tax concessions for small businesses. The Budget continues the Australian Government's focus on certain foreign-based multinationals, after the Australian Senate's inquiry focussed on the Australian tax positions of leading global e-commerce companies.

As a significant integrity measure to protect Australia's revenue base, draft legislation has been released outlining anti-avoidance rules combatting multinational tax avoidance.

Under the proposed section 177DA of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, tax benefits will be cancelled in respect of schemes that satisfy all of the following requirements:

Under, or in connection with, the scheme

  • goods or services are provided by a non-resident to an Australian resident who is not an associate of the non-resident;

  • income derived by the non-resident from the supply is not attributable to an Australian permanent establishment (PE);

  • activities are undertaken in Australia by an Australian resident, or through an Australian PE of an associate of the non-resident or who is commercially dependent on the non-resident, in connection with the supply;

Scheme designed to avoid PE income

  • it would be reasonable to conclude that the scheme is designed to avoid the non-resident deriving income attributable to an Australian PE;

Double principal purpose test

  • a person or persons who entered into or carried out the scheme did so for a principal (as opposed to a sole or dominant) purpose of enabling a taxpayer to obtain an Australian tax benefit (that is, an Australian income tax saving) and to reduce foreign taxes or secure a saving from other Australian taxes (for example, GST);

Global revenue threshold

  • annual global revenue of the non-resident in the relevant income year exceeds $1 billion; and

No or low corporate tax jurisdiction

  • the non-resident is connected with a no or low corporate tax jurisdiction.

Other measures to tighten the rules for multinationals include adopting stronger penalties for groups that enter into tax avoidance measures related to profit shifting, and applying new transfer pricing documentation standards from January 1 2016.

The Budget confirms the GST rules are to be extended to the importations of digital products and services. This so called 'Netflix' tax is designed to ensure that non-resident suppliers of such content pay GST, thereby levelling the playing field for Australian suppliers already subject to GST. This measure is consistent with the OECD's guidelines on this subject, but under Australia's laws will require the approval of all states and territories to be enacted.

Jock McCormack (jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper

Tel: +61 2 9286 8253

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
TP is a growing priority for West and Central African tax authorities, writes Winnie Maliko, but enforcement remains inconsistent, and data limitations persist
The UK tax agency has appointed six independent industry specialists to the panel
The two tax partners have significant experience and expertise in transactional and tax structuring matters
Katie Leah’s arrival marks a significant step in Skadden’s ambition to build a specialised, 10-partner London tax team by 2030, the firm’s European tax head tells ITR
Gift this article