Spain: Latest developments on transfer pricing legislation in Spain

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: Latest developments on transfer pricing legislation in Spain

calle.jpg

fernandez.jpg

Mario Ortega Calle


Iñigo García Fernández

The Spanish government has recently approved a major amendment to the Corporate Income Tax Law (CITL) where important modifications have been included regarding transfer pricing, in alignment with the latest transfer pricing developments in the OECD's base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project. The necessary ownership interest in a subsidiary in order to be considered 'related parties' has been increased from 5% to 25%, directly or indirectly.

Other substantial modifications have been included such as the elimination of relatedness where members are deemed related to each other simply because one of them forms part of a business group with the entity in which they both have ownership interests. Additionally, the remuneration paid by an entity to its directors (both official directors and those acting as such) for their activities is no longer treated as a controlled transaction.

The option to elect simplified documentation rules has been broadened (implementing regulations have yet to be passed) in relation to related persons or entities with net revenues below €45 million ($48 million). The previous limit was €10 million.

Following the criteria previously defined by the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprise and Tax Administrations (OECD guidelines), the CITL eliminates the valuation methodology hierarchy to determine an arm's-length price. It also provides for the possibility to apply other valuation methodologies.

The activities that the tax authorities can carry out have generally been broadened. Whereas the former law authorised the tax authorities to review that the transactions performed between related parties were priced at arm's-length, the CITL states that they may also review the nature of the intercompany transactions.

A new provision has been added requiring taxpayers with permanent establishments abroad to include in their tax bases the estimated income, calculated on an arm's-length basis, that will be obtained on domestic transactions performed with these establishments, although on condition that this is allowed by an applicable tax treaty. In this regard, to date, none of the treaties signed by Spain allow that option, although it may appear in the ones signed or renegotiated in the future.

A new option has been included allowing the secondary adjustment not to be made when the differences arising from the incorrect pricing on an arm's-length basis of a given controlled transaction are restored. The CITL clarifies that this restoration will not determine the existence of income at the affected parties.

Additionally, attention must be paid to the modifications related to advance pricing agreements (APAs). The new CITL increases the range of application of APAs to previous fiscal years as long as they are not statute barred, taking as reference the year when the APA is agreed.

The penalty regime has also been modified by lowering the penalties applicable in case of tax infringement related to the provision of an incomplete or inaccurate documentation or to the need of pricing adjustments in the intercompany transactions. The most important amendment in this regard relates to the arm's-length value determined for corporate income tax (CIT), non-resident income tax or personal income tax purposes having no effect on other taxes, and vice versa.

The obligation to price and document transactions performed with persons or entities resident in tax havens remains and the option to use the value agreed by the parties if a higher amount of tax results in Spain has been removed.

Lastly, further to the OECD developments on the BEPS project and, more specifically, regarding country-by-country reporting, the Spanish Tax Administration has recently publicly announced that Spain will introduce new transfer pricing documentation requirements in the upcoming CIT regulation that will address the developments in the CITL.

Given the importance of the changes introduced (and those to come very soon), taxpayers in Spain should carefully review their transfer pricing policies and supporting documentations to ensure these are fully compliant with the new regulations.

Mario Ortega Calle (mario.ortega.calle@garrigues.com) and Iñigo García Fernández (inigo.garcia@garrigues.com)

Garrigues – Taxand, Madrid

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The High Court’s dismissal of barrister Setu Kamal’s legal challenge represents the first successful strike-out under a new law on SLAPPs
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
As Coca-Cola awaits a crucial 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision this year, its multibillion-dollar tax dispute could have profound implications for investors, cash flow, and corporate transparency
However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Gift this article