Mexico: New miscellaneous rules introduce additional flexibility on the Mexican maquila regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New miscellaneous rules introduce additional flexibility on the Mexican maquila regime

cuellar.jpg

salagaray.jpg

David Cuellar


Cesar Salagaray

The 2014 tax reform introduced significant changes and restrictions on the Mexican maquila income tax regime, one of which is the requirement that the income from operating activities must derive exclusively from maquila operations. Under the former rules, many multinational entities (MNEs) opted to structure their operations in a way that the maquila entity carried out certain activities that could be considered as auxiliary to the production activity itself, such as the lease of space (real estate) or assets to other group entities, rendering employee services, disposal of scrap or limited distribution of certain goods.

Considering the new rules in force since January 1 2014, many multinationals operating under these type of combined structures could have lost the benefits set forth by article 181 of the Mexican Income Tax Law as a consequence of the income derived from non-maquila auxiliary activities.

However, on July 1 2014, the Mexican tax authorities published a new amendment to the Mexican miscellaneous rules in force for 2014 and among other changes, introduced certain clarifications and changes to the current maquila regime through rule I.3.19.1.

In general terms, the new miscellaneous rules provide additional flexibility allowing Mexican Maquiladora companies to carry out certain "complementary" activities as part of their "productive income" without jeopardising their maquila status. The complementary activities allowed for maquila companies could be summarised as follows:

  • Employee services (lease of personnel);

  • Leasing/sale of movable and real estate property;

  • Disposal of scrap produced by maquila operations;

  • Interest income; and

  • Other income related to the maquila operations, except for sales of finished goods.

These new rules and the permitted complementary activities may avoid the need for certain multinationals that were carrying out combined maquila activities to restructure their operations or even losing the maquila regime, within the rules, the Maquiladora company must comply with the following requirements:

  • The total of this other income should not exceed 10% of the total income from the maquila operations;

  • In the case of personnel leasing, the employees should be provided only to related parties;

  • Additional information filing requirements (consisting basically in providing segmented information regarding the complementary activities);

  • To file a notification in case of the sale of movable and real estate property.

These regulations will become effective on October 1 2014. Meanwhile, Maquiladoras can continue to consider that their total income qualifies as derived from their maquila activity, if and only if they maintain accounting records that allow differentiation between each type of income and associated costs and expenses.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Cesar Salagaray (cesar.salagaray@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Rafael Tena tells ITR about the ‘crazy’ Mexican market, ditching the hourly rate, and refusing to grow his fledgling firm in an ‘unstructured way’
It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Gift this article