Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Debate still continues on US carried interest

28 December 2010

Richard Zarin and William Zimmerman of Morgan Lewis & Bockius investigate why the US Congress is having such difficulty passing carried interest legislation.

Since 2007 the US Congress has considered legislation numerous times that would subject investment fund managers to increased US federal income taxes on the share of investment partnership profits they are allocated in return for investment advisory services provided to such partnerships (carried interest). Why hasn't some form of carried interest legislation been passed to date? We believe the answer to this question is quite simple: The line drawing necessary to differentiate (and impose additional tax on) income attributable to investment management services provided by partners to US partnerships, without changing the favoured tax treatment of true equity investments in such partnerships, is just too difficult in light of the flexibility provided in US partnership tax rules, and in the current US political environment.

While there are a number of competing policy factors at play, we believe that two of such factors are the most significant.

The most compelling argument...



This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.

  • Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
  • New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
  • Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.

If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: nburroughs@euromoneyplc.com, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379

Subscribe now

Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.

Subscribe

Free trial

Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.

Free trial





International Tax Review Profile

Office emptying? Boss gone? Induldge in a long lunch break reading the #GlobalTax50 2014 http://t.co/V37QvH9b2e

Dec 19 2014 11:37 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

@sarahwprior Yes, talk about changing one's tune in double-quick time. The @EU_Commission prez may have had something to do with this.

Dec 19 2014 10:45 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @gouv_lu: Luxembourg committed to establishing level playing field on transparency on #tax rulings @Xavier_Bettel http://t.co/5ACMHgGl80

Dec 19 2014 10:22 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

@Vestager welcomes @gouv_lu decision to provide info on #tax rulings practice and #patentbox http://t.co/YnOPUsku7E #Luxembourg

Dec 19 2014 10:20 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

Welcome to all our new followers @avalara @AxactAccounting @bankhousecorp @birdncocouk. Have a great weekend!

Dec 19 2014 10:08 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents

After the Irish budget, what would make you more likely to put more substance into Ireland?