Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Debate still continues on US carried interest

28 December 2010

Richard Zarin and William Zimmerman of Morgan Lewis & Bockius investigate why the US Congress is having such difficulty passing carried interest legislation.

Since 2007 the US Congress has considered legislation numerous times that would subject investment fund managers to increased US federal income taxes on the share of investment partnership profits they are allocated in return for investment advisory services provided to such partnerships (carried interest). Why hasn't some form of carried interest legislation been passed to date? We believe the answer to this question is quite simple: The line drawing necessary to differentiate (and impose additional tax on) income attributable to investment management services provided by partners to US partnerships, without changing the favoured tax treatment of true equity investments in such partnerships, is just too difficult in light of the flexibility provided in US partnership tax rules, and in the current US political environment.

While there are a number of competing policy factors at play, we believe that two of such factors are the most significant.

The most compelling argument...



This article is locked content, available to current subscribers or trialists.

  • Current subscribers or trialists - Please log in to view this article in full.
  • New users - Please take a free 7 day trial.
  • Expired subscribers or trialists - Please subscribe to gain immediate full access.

If you think you've received this message in error, please contact your account manager, Nick Burroughs:
Email: nburroughs@euromoneyplc.com, Tel: +44 (0)207 779 8379

Subscribe now

Subscribe today to gain full access to International Tax Review.

Subscribe

Free trial

Take a free trial now and gain 7 days of full access to International Tax Review.

Free trial





International Tax Review Profile

.@aislingtax #Ireland likely to lose @Apple #tax deals skirmish http://t.co/DLCMQlyt0u @EU_Commission will have to prepare for a fight then

Sep 5 2015 02:46 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

#ff @KeithMacCATax @Prixdetransfert @TaxesRita @tosacarte @p_sfitz

Sep 4 2015 06:02 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

How to resolve disputes in India http://t.co/LPVzfw9ScH Read about #taxcontroversyleaders2015 from #Asia here http://t.co/pmt90zZgTT

Sep 4 2015 03:48 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

RT @taxmOuth: TaxProse Daily Tax News is out! http://t.co/cP6JZgGX4d Stories via @wwwtaxproffcom @IntlTaxReview

Sep 3 2015 05:44 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Tax Review Profile

Two individuals. Plenty of very good women in the groups on the list, but, yes, it wasn't enough. #globaltax50 2015 https://t.co/LtlZCjerUG

Sep 3 2015 05:43 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
International Correspondents

After the Irish budget, what would make you more likely to put more substance into Ireland?