EU Anti-Avoidance Directive and Irish Holding Companies – Taxation of Dividends

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU Anti-Avoidance Directive and Irish Holding Companies – Taxation of Dividends

The hastily adopted EU Anti-Avoidance Directive ("Directive") requires European Union (EU) member states to introduce or amend their existing Controlled Foreign Companies ("CFC") legislation.

Unlike many EU countries, Ireland taxes dividends at either a 12.5% or 25% corporation tax rate and operates a wide-ranging credit system for double tax relief. Ireland taxes dividends as an alternative to having a CFC regime. With the BREXIT vote decided and the UK expected to highlight the benefit of the UK as a holding company location which exempts dividends, the Irish may change their tax regime.

Under the Directive, Ireland is required to introduce CFC law by December 31 2018, which is to take effect from January 1 2019. While Ireland has amended its tax code to ensure dividends can flow tax-free between EU companies by way of a deemed tax credit, the requirement to introduce a CFC regime increases the pressure on the Irish Department of Finance to introduce law to exempt dividends from tax.

With the new Irish coalition government beginning to get to grips with its work, it should be fair to expect the Irish Department of Finance to at least consider over the summer the possibility of introducing legislation to exempt foreign dividends received by Irish holding companies. Such a move would be welcome and could considerably enhance the attraction of Ireland as a holding company location.

This article was prepared by Mason Hayes & Curran, International Tax Review’s correspondents in Ireland. For further information, please contact:

John Gulliver 100

John Gulliver, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 5007
E: jgulliver@mhc.ie

Robert Henson 100

Robert Henson, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 2314
E: rhenson@mhc.ie

Maureeen 100

Maura Dineen, tax partner.
T: +353 1 614 2444
E: mdineen@mhc.ie

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Gift this article