New Netherlands agreement could open tax planning opportunities

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Netherlands agreement could open tax planning opportunities

nl-curacao-handshake.jpg

The Dutch Ministry of Finance has announced that the Netherlands and Curacao have agreed the text of a new bilateral tax arrangement designed to avoid double taxation. The agreement could create new tax planning opportunities.

The agreement will introduce a 0% dividend withholding tax rate on distributions of profits. At present, the lowest dividend withholding tax rate available is 8.3%, but the zero rate will apply to dividends paid to certain active parent companies if they satisfy a limitation of benefits (LOB) clause.

“The dividend withholding tax rate on dividends paid to parent companies that will not qualify under the LOB provision will be 15%,” said Marc Sanders of Taxand Netherlands. “However, this rate will be reduced to 5% up to and including 2019 for distributions by companies to their parent companies which hold a minimum interest of 25%. Furthermore, the Netherlands has confirmed that a frequently used structure to eliminate dividend withholding tax between the Netherlands and Curacao through the use of a Dutch Coop will be respected until at least the end of 2014.”

While the 0% dividend withholding tax rate could bring about the birth of new tax planning schemes, Sanders points out that the LOB provision to be contained in the agreement is likely to limit those opportunities.

“Curacao was old-school planning in the 1980s and 1990s with a lot of structures through it. The new agreement may resurrect part of that but anti-abuse clauses are included,” said Sanders. “So the new agreement will probably not result in a major resurgence of Curacao as a tax planning location but will certainly offer new opportunities.”

The agreement – which will also see the countries engage in automatic information exchange – is subject to parliamentary procedures in both countries and is expected to become effective from January 1 2015.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Gift this article