International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,160 results that match your search.33,160 results
  • Singapore has been increasing its focus on transfer pricing, explain Geoffrey K Soh, Felicia Chia and Jingyi Lee of KPMG, with yearly revisions of the TP guidelines as well as the adoption of country-by-country reporting requirements. Recently, there has been a greater-than-ever push to ensure that taxpayers’ profitability is consistent with the economic activities conducted and value generated.
  • Over the past year, the Australian transfer pricing (TP) landscape has continued to evolve. There is new legislation and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is continuing to prioritise TP as a key area, write Tim Keeling, Jay Mankad and Jennifer Goldkopf of KPMG.
  • Indonesia completed the last step in the introduction of new transfer pricing regulations late last year, report Iwan Hoo, Aaron Brunier and Fachrur Rifqi Nugroho of KPMG. While the regulations covering the master file, local file and country-by-country reporting were issued in 2016, the implementing regulations for CbCR were not completed until late December 2017.
  • The National Assembly of Korea approved the 2017 Tax Reform Bill on December 5 2017, write Gil Won Kang, Sang Hoon Kim and Seung-Mok Baek of KPMG.
  • To align with international tax trends, Taiwan’s Ministry of Finance (MoF) announced amendments on November 13 2017 to existing transfer pricing assessment regulations, write Sherry Chang, Karl Chan and Anita Lin of KPMG.
  • Vietnam’s regulatory changes have required an increasing number of taxpayers having to be aware of the transfer pricing rules, explain Hoang Thuy Duong, Tran Thi Thuy Ha and Sandra Liston of KPMG. However, inconsistencies in the interpretation has led to substantial efforts by the tax authority to clarify the rules.
  • The New Zealand transfer pricing landscape has changed rapidly over the past year, explain Kim Jarrett, Kyle Finnerty and Nadia Fediaeva of KPMG. With new BEPS legislation enacted, increased tax enforcement efforts, the Inland Revenue restructuring and a new government promising an increase in spending on tax enforcement, what more could happen in a year?
  • Transfer pricing is on the radar again in the Philippines, reports Maria Carmela Peralta of KPMG. It’s too early to tell whether the lengthy discussions taking place will bear fruit and the Philippines will have something other to show than its 2013 TP regulations, which the Philippine Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) is perceived to have overlooked.
  • As explained by Cheng Chi, Rafael Triginelli Miraglia and Choon Beng Teoh of KPMG, transfer pricing continues to be one of the Chinese State Administration of Taxation’s key areas of focus, as new policies and methodologies are being examined post-BEPS to strengthen the SAT’s monitoring of multinational enterprises’ TP
  • Transfer pricing rules were introduced in Sri Lanka in 2006 and became enforceable from 2008, writes Shamila Jayasekara of KPMG. The revenue authorities did not administratively enforce the rules, giving time for taxpayers to conform to requirements.