The Canadian government has deferred the enactment of a controversial proposal introduced in February 2000 as part of its attempt to tighten Canada's thin capitalization rules. The proposal was aimed at preventing foreign shareholders from using an excessive amount of debt when capitalizing their Canadian subsidiaries (see International Tax Review, April 2000, "Federal Budget 2000"). For Canadian companies with taxation years beginning after 2000, the government proposed that the maximum debt-to-equity ratio be reduced from 3:1 to 2:1. Debt will equal the average of the highest monthly amount payable to parent and certain other non-resident shareholders. Equity will be the aggregate of paid-up capital and contributed surplus, attributable to certain non-resident shareholders and computed as the average of the opening monthly balances, plus retained earnings computed at the beginning of the year. Moreover, the definition of tainted debt would have included loans from domestic and foreign third parties guaranteed or secured by the parent company or certain other non-resident shareholders. This controversial proposal would have adversely affected many Canadian subsidiaries of foreign multinationals that cannot borrow significant amounts, or borrow at a reasonable cost without a parent company guarantee. The proposal would also have affected many financial services companies that provide alternative sources of capital to Canadian businesses backed by non-resident parent guarantees.
June 30 2000